Social Science Lit Review
Step-by-step narrative review writing
Social Science Lit Review
Step-by-step narrative review writing
Showcase
Description
A staged guidance system for narrative literature reviews in the social sciences. It follows the AFP methodology—building the background → creating a classification framework → critical evaluation → deriving research gaps → integration audit—to gather information step by step, save intermediate results, and generate a review with traceable citations. Example: “Use the Social Science Literature Review Guide to help me write a literature review.” Scenario: undergraduate thesis proposal; topic example: mechanisms for improving organizational resilience in small and medium-sized enterprises undergoing digital transformation; literature: Zhang San (2022)… (provide 3–5 entries in the format author (year): one-sentence finding); length: 5,000–8,000 words, GB/T 7714 format.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchAI-Assisted Literature Review
Guides users through a structured process for writing academic literature reviews based on the Five-Source AFP methodology. It covers four core stages: building the review background, developing a classification framework, conducting critical evaluation, and deriving research gaps. Built-in anti-hallucination safeguards, iterative loop validation, and academic compliance checks help ensure literature review text that is academically sound and logically rigorous.
Social Sci Lit Review Coach V3
A literature review writing coach for social science graduate theses. Graduate students provide their literature, and the coach reviews the quality and timeliness of the materials. It deconstructs key information, including core arguments, research methods, and innovations, helping students deeply understand the core content. The coach then organizes, summarizes, and refines the literature, synthesizing it into a complete literature review of approximately 5,000 to 10,000 words that meets graduate academic standards.
WritePhD Research Proposal & Review
Transforms research ideas into rigorously structured, clearly argued academic research proposals and literature reviews for PhD applicants across STEM, humanities, and social sciences. You can provide your research topic, core questions, target institutions or advisor directions, and existing papers or materials. The Skill integrates relevant research progress to help organize the theoretical background, current research status, key gaps, and proposed methods, building a targeted research framework for your application. Before formal drafting, it provides a research proposal outline for your confirmation, making it easy to adjust the focus, scope, and length. Once confirmed, it generates a complete proposal of approximately 2,000–4,000 words covering research background, research questions, literature review, methods, timeline, expected contributions, and references, using appropriate academic citation styles and formal register based on your discipline. The content supports Chinese or English output, emphasizing coherent academic discourse, prudent argumentation, and clear research value, while offering diagram suggestions for research frameworks, methodological workflows, or academic impact at key points. The final result is delivered as a Markdown document, accompanied by checklists for structure, citations, and academic expression to facilitate further revision or conversion into Word, PDF, and other formats.
Information
- Version
- v8
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
- Use cases
- Writing & contentResearch & analysisLearning & education
- What you get
- ArticleReportDocument
