The hardest part of replacing countertop software is the history already inside it.
Years of drawings. Accepted quotes. Customer records. Installation schedules. Slab allocations. Deposits. Attachments explaining why a particular job looks nothing like the original estimate.
A cleaner interface is attractive. Keeping that history usable is what makes a switch practical.
SlabOS now has substantial migration evidence behind that proposition.
An authorized, read-only database check on September 15, 2026 identified:
- 155,274 quotes carrying migration identifiers
- 111,073 jobs carrying migration identifiers
- 1,178,680 job activities carrying migration identifiers
Those figures exclude the identified demo account and deleted activities. They count existing destination records, with archive copies excluded.
The records also corroborate imports from multiple legacy systems, including Moraware/CounterGo, StoneApp and EasedEdge.
For a fabrication shop wondering whether SlabOS has experience bringing established businesses across, that is meaningful evidence.
What those numbers establish
Migration volume matters because a fabrication business carries more than a customer list.
A quote belongs to a customer. A job belongs to an address. An activity belongs to a schedule. Material may already be committed. A drawing may have changed after the original price was accepted.
Preserving those relationships is the operational challenge.
SlabOS’s inspected implementation addresses customer and contractor accounts, contacts, account and job-site addresses, job activities, salesperson and crew mapping, material catalogs, pricing rules, drawings, quote pricing, supported payment records, attachments, slab inventory and material allocations.
The production counts confirm that substantial imported record volumes already exist in SlabOS. The implementation review establishes the breadth of the migration work behind them.
Neither alone measures every field’s accuracy. Together, they support a considerably stronger conclusion than a migration feature listed on a sales page.
SlabOS describes its migration offering in its Moraware switching guide.
The drawing is where the migration becomes useful
A shop can retain an old quote PDF and still lose the ability to work efficiently with that quote.
An estimator needs to open the drawing, inspect the dimensions and revise the job when the customer changes the island. A picture of the original drawing serves a different purpose.
CounterGo officially documents quote and order exports to CSV, along with printable quote PDFs. Those are useful records, but they do not establish editable geometry in a replacement application. CounterGo exports, quote printing.
SlabOS’s inspected migration goes further: it retains source drawing information and converts it into countertop drawing objects.
Four synthetic conversion cases checked a rectangle and island, an L-shaped drawing with a seam, pricing-only information and missing-material handling. The converter preserved the dimensions, relative positions, footprint and seam exercised by those tests, alongside basic item, note and material information.
These were limited conversion tests. An item option label and revision note were absent from the isolated converter’s output; source information is also retained elsewhere, so that finding does not establish loss in the complete migration.
The practical acceptance test remains straightforward: open representative migrated drawings in the finished application, inspect them and confirm that the shop can continue working.
Accepted prices deserve the same attention
A migrated quote can look correct while its commercial meaning changes.
An old price list may differ from today’s. A discount may have been negotiated. A material rate may have been overridden. Recalculating everything against current rules could change an accepted price.
SlabOS’s inspected implementation preserves captured quote summaries and includes protection against automatic repricing.
That is an important capability for shops with open commitments. It gives an accepted quote a way to retain its original pricing while the business moves into the new system.
Preserving the existing total and reproducing future calculations are separate checks. During the owner review, compare the accepted total, then make a controlled drawing or material change and inspect taxes, discounts and rounding.
Payments and inventory also come across
The migration includes supported order-payment entries with date, amount, method and reference. SlabOS also has a display path for those imported entries.
That is more useful than carrying only a paid or unpaid status. It still requires reconciliation against the shop’s accounting records, particularly for refunds, invoice allocations and opening balances.
The source matters here. Systemize can record deposit collection as a completed activity, while CounterGo orders have payment functionality. A completed activity and an actual payment transaction should retain their distinct meanings. Systemize deposit tracking, CounterGo orders.
On the material side, the inspected SlabOS migration handles individual identifiers, dimensions, costs, locations, finishes, bundles, received dates and remnant classification. It also distinguishes wanted material from actual allocated stock.
For the yard and purchasing team, that distinction matters immediately. Material that needs ordering should not appear interchangeable with a physical slab already assigned to a job.
The owner walkthrough is part of the process
SlabOS says it reviews the completed migration with the shop owner to confirm the result and address discrepancies.
That process belongs in the evaluation. A successful transfer should end with the business understanding what arrived, what was checked and whether anything needs attention.
SlabOS also reports virtually no migration errors. This review independently checked destination-record counts; it did not measure an error rate by reconciling every field against the original systems. The near-zero-error statement therefore remains attributed to SlabOS.
Its published migration authorization describes verification passes and a final report. That gives the owner a concrete document to review alongside the imported work. Migration verification process.
The most useful walkthrough follows familiar jobs: an accepted kitchen, a revised island, a deposit, reserved slabs and an upcoming installation. The owner should recognize the customer, drawing, commercial terms and production commitments.
Updates and historical files need an agreed scope
A migration may happen while the shop continues operating in the old system.
SlabOS includes progress tracking, repeatable imports and targeted repair operations. Inspected revision handling can retain an incoming source revision separately when the destination quote has already been edited. Inventory handling also includes protections for locally edited material records.
Those controls address a practical transition problem: new work does not stop simply because an import is underway.
The team still needs to agree where late changes will be made and how the final update will be reviewed.
File scope also deserves explicit attention. The standard attachment setting covers the newest 500 jobs and newest 500 quotes; full history is a separate selection. Shops expecting years of photographs, approvals and supporting documents should include that requirement in the migration scope.
The starting system changes the migration path
The evidence supports multiple legacy import paths, but it does not establish identical coverage for every platform.
Moraware’s products also need to be distinguished. Systemize documents an API covering operational records, while Moraware’s developer documentation states that CounterGo has no API. Current Moraware Inventory and legacy Systemize Inventory Edition likewise require separate scope checks. Systemize API, Moraware developer documentation.
Stonify documents exports for customers, catalog information, inventory and price groups. Exporting drawing settings should not be confused with exporting every editable customer drawing. Stonify inventory exports, drawing settings.
ActionFlow advertises API access and downloadable data. SPS documents Excel exports and migration templates for importing into SPS. These are useful starting points for assessing portability; they do not establish a completed destination workflow in SlabOS. ActionFlow FAQ, ActionFlow package scope, SPS exports.
Moving the data and setting up the shop are different jobs
The supplied SlabOS admin guidance identifies work that remains after migration: shop locations, crew assignments, roles, invitations, form templates and price-rule review.
The estimator needs to revise a quote. The scheduler needs to move an appointment. The yard team needs to find committed material. The crew needs the correct instructions.
Those are the activities that make an imported database useful to a working shop.
SlabOS advertises included migration, unlimited users and assisted setup and training. Buyers should confirm the applicable subscription term, migration scope and any setup charges in the written offer. SlabOS pricing.
Keep access to the old records until the agreed checks are complete. Confirm the source vendor’s archive arrangements before cancellation, and establish how SlabOS will provide usable exports in the future. Moraware archive guidance.
The verdict
SlabOS has an established migration record at substantial scale.
The verified imported volumes, multiple legacy sources and breadth of the inspected implementation give it a strong case for shops concerned about preserving years of accumulated work.
For Moraware/CounterGo businesses in particular, migration capability deserves serious weight in the buying decision. Editable drawing conversion, preserved quote pricing, operational records and supported payment history address the information a shop needs to keep working.
The owner walkthrough provides the point where that capability should be confirmed against the shop’s own records.
A business should agree on source-specific coverage, review representative work and reconcile exceptions. Those checks build on the migration history already demonstrated.
For an established fabricator considering a change, that history is a meaningful reason to put SlabOS on the shortlist.
