Qualitative Rigor & COREQ Auditor
Audits your rigor strategies against COREQ
Qualitative Rigor & COREQ Auditor
Audits your rigor strategies against COREQ
Description
Writes a Methods section based on Lincoln & Guba's trustworthiness criteria from your qualitative study design; then reveals which COREQ checklist items are missing or weakly reported, without concealment. Who it's for: researchers seeking reporting robustness before journal submission and graduate students writing a thesis.
Recommended by
Shuting@YouMind
Why we love this skill
An editor-level audit that turns your documented qualitative procedures into a trustworthiness-focused Methods section, then tests every reporting detail against COREQ’s 32 items. It is especially valuable for exposing missing reflexivity and rigor evidence without inventing strategies or overstating compliance.
Showcase
Related Skills
View all
ResearchSTROBE/CONSORT Methods-Results Writer
Produces a complete Methods + Results section following the reporting standard that fits your study design (STROBE for observational studies, CONSORT for randomized controlled trials); then audits which checklist items are missing or weakly reported without concealment, and suggests how to complete them. Who it's for: researchers seeking reporting robustness before journal submission and graduate students writing a thesis.
ResearchSTROBE Methods Writer
Based on your cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control study design; when you enter your participant selection method, variables, sample size rationale, and statistical methods, it produces a complete Methods and Results draft with implicit reference to all 22 items of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist. It also provides a mapping table at the end showing which paragraph corresponds to which STROBE item — ready to answer a journal's "please complete the STROBE checklist" request. Avoids causal language (uses "is associated with" rather than "causes" for observational studies) and explicitly discusses sources of bias/confounding. Suitable for academics working in epidemiology, public health, and clinical research.
ResearchStatistical Report + Reviewer Objection
Produces a complete Results section from your descriptive + inferential statistics outputs (including assumption tests). If it detects a normality or variance homogeneity violation, it recommends the non-parametric alternative test rather than concealing it. It also pre-identifies at least 4 objections journal reviewers commonly raise (e.g., "assumption tests not reported", "effect size not stated", "no multiple comparison correction applied") and provides a defense sentence for each. Who it's for: researchers working with quantitative methods who want statistical reporting rigor before journal submission.
