A slide with seven black bullet points in a row. It's a bit dull, isn't it? But just by passing it through AI, it transforms into a "page that looks like it was made by a consultant."
Today, I'm leaving all the steps here in a copy-pasteable format. (This is a must-save!)
First, take a look at this.
Seeing is believing. Here is how the same slide content changes.

The top is the original slide with many bullet points. The right is after the AI remake.
No information was added, and none was removed. Only the arrangement was changed.
Yet, the power of communication is completely different.
The top is "hard to digest," while the bottom is "organized and easy to understand."
Even though the information is the same, there's this much difference. What exactly is the difference?
Why bullet points don't stick in your head.
The answer is because there is no structure.
Bullet points are just information "stacked vertically." Which part is important? What is related to what? What is the ultimate point?
Everything is flat, and priorities and relationships are invisible. The reader has to organize it in their own head. That's why it's tiring and doesn't stay in the mind.
Great documents are the opposite.
Information is built with a "structure." Is it a comparison, a flow, or cause and effect? Because that skeleton is visible, it can be understood at a glance.
This AI remake is about reconfiguring into a "structured slide." I've packed this into the prompt.
Tutorial: AI Remake
It's not difficult. There are only three things to do.
- Prepare the material you want to remake.
- Paste the prompt below and insert the material.
- Done. You can also edit the output image.
You use an AI that can generate images (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.).
I will explain this flow with screenshots.
Step 1: Give the material to the AI
Prepare the slide you want to remake as an image or PDF and attach it to the AI.

Step 2: Paste the remake prompt
Copy and paste the entire prompt below and execute it.
It looks very long, but there's nothing to tweak. Lol. Just put in the material and run it.
1Please restructure the information in the following <input> into a "structure" and recreate it as a consultant-quality single slide that allows the reader to make decisions at a glance.23This is not just a cleanup. The goal is to read the "intent" of bullet points, notes, or simple slides and reach the "So What" (what can be said). The principle is "subtract rather than add." Charm the reader with information contrast and white space.45# Input6<input>7(Paste the bullet points, notes, or slide image you want to remake here)8</input>910# Task (Think and execute in this order)11Step 1. Decoding: Extract "① Main message (claim) / ② Elements (items, numbers, relationships) / ③ Reader and context" from the input.12 Do not add or drop facts arbitrarily. However, you should actively draw out implications (So What) that can be derived from the given facts.13 In the case of a slide image, diagnose current weaknesses (violations of the design principles/rules below).14Step 2. Choose Structure: Select the best one from the "6 Structures" (nested if necessary). If it fits a "Representative Layout," prioritize that.15 If none fit, you may use another structure/diagram optimal for the content. However, do not leave it as a list of bullet points (always structure it).16Step 3. Choose Graph: If there are numerical values, choose one from the "7 Graphs." If not, do not use any.17Step 4. Choose Layout: Adopt if it fits a "Representative Layout."18Step 5. Head Messaging: Place the claim at the top in a single sentence (conclusion. Noun endings or "About..." are prohibited).19 If possible, go as far as the implication (what should be done). Facts go in the body, implications in the head or a separate box (side message). Only one main message per page.20Step 6. Apply the "4 Design Principles" and "Design Rules."21Step 7. Generation: Create one 16:9 slide image.22Step 8. Pre-output Check + Final Polish: Pass all items in the "Pre-output Check" below.23 Furthermore, ask yourself if a first-time viewer of this slide can state the claim in "3 seconds." If not, restructure the head message and structure. Fix it before outputting.2425# Knowledge Base (What and how to structure)2627## 6 Structures (Step 2)28Judge by "Is it a matter of arrangement or logic?" Structures can be nested.29- Sequence: Chronology, process, steps → Left-to-right arrows/steps30- Comparison: As-is/To-be, binary opposition, competition → Side-by-side, Before/After31- Classification: MECE, categories, option organization → Matrix, tree32- Problem Solving: Issue → Action → Effect → 3-block arrow flow33- Causality: Cause → Result, Why, So what → Chain of arrows, fishbone34- Pyramid: Conclusion + 3 grounds → Conclusion at the top, 3 grounds below3536## 7 Graphs (Step 3 / Only when there are numbers)37- Bar: Difference in quantity / Line: Trend over time / Waterfall: Increase/decrease process / Funnel: Conversion rate / Bubble: 3-axis relationship / Heatmap: Density38- Composition: Prioritize 100% stacked horizontal bars (Pie charts only up to 3 segments; avoid in principle)39- NG: Quantity as circles / Categories as lines / More than 3 axes in 1 graph / 3D4041## Representative Layouts (Step 4 / If applicable)42- Business Improvement Before/After: Align positions perfectly vertically or horizontally, use dashed lines for omitted parts, show reduction effects with thick arrows43- Measure Priority: Logic tree (MECE decomposition) + time/risk evaluation table on the right / or 2-axis matrix + extraction logic44- Cost/Time Breakdown and Actions: Waterfall graph on the left, action table on the right, total and reduction rate at the bottom45- Comparing Multiple Objects with Same Structure: Place common items at the top only once, align objects vertically (avoid repeating horizontal layouts)46- Overview + Detail: Split left/right. Overview on the left, enlargement of a part on the right, connected by dotted lines47- Approval/Deliberation Flow: Vertical = Meeting body/department, Horizontal = Process, Arrows = Information transfer (with content labels)48- Multiple Parallel Projects: Vertical = Stream, Horizontal = Time, dashed lines for undecided starts49- Industry/Market Structure: Horizontal = Value chain, Vertical = Player type, Area = Scale50- Showing Scale and Ratio Simultaneously: Area diagram (Mosaic) on left/right. Area = Amount scale x Ratio, total value at the bottom51- Dynamic Change of 2 Indicators: Plot objects (generations, chronology, etc.) on a scatter plot, connect with trajectory lines, and annotate change points5253## 4 Design Principles (Must pass in Step 6)541. Vertical/Horizontal: Always clarify the meaning of the vertical and horizontal axes (Vertical = Object/Category/Meeting, Horizontal = Time/Process/Judgment axis, etc.)552. Non-redundancy: Do not use the same word twice. Group repeating words into axes or headings563. Two-dimensional: Do not pack 3 or more axes into one page. If there are many, decompose into left/right split, vertical alignment, or close-up574. Visual Volume: Always reflect the size of numerical values in the size of area, length, or thickness5859# Design Rules (How to show = Consultant quality discipline)6061## General Policy62- Completely flat. Prohibit shadows, gradients, 3D, bevels, glows, and reflections.63- Background is pure white. Use only the palette below (do not add colors outside the palette).64- "If you want to add, first ask if you can subtract." Leave wide white space intentionally (Apple-style elegant margins).6566## Layout67- Align all elements to a grid, equal spacing, unified four-side margins. Principle: Left-aligned (Center-aligned only for covers/section breaks).68- Eye movement is Left → Right, Top → Bottom. Place data on the left, implications/actions on the right.6970## Font71- Fixed to Noto Sans JP-style sans-serif (Prohibit Mincho, decorative fonts, handwriting style).72- Size hierarchy: Title 24-28 / Header Message 18-20 / Subheading 14 / Body 10.5-12 / Footnote 8-9pt.73- Weights are only Regular and Bold. Line spacing 1.3-1.5. Body text is #222222, auxiliary is #888888 (Do not use pure black).74- Unify punctuation, symbols, endings, and half-width/full-width across all pages.7576## Emphasis77- Priority: ① Color → ② Size → ③ Bold → ④ Box.78- Emphasis should be less than 10% of the screen, 1-2 places per slide. Make it stand out relatively by dropping non-emphasis to #888888.79- Emphasize long text with color rather than bold. Prohibit underlining, italics, markers, and excessive red text.8081## Color (Fixed roles)82- Title/Heading bar = #1976D2, Emphasis word = #D84315, Light fill = #E8F4FB, Body = #222222, Auxiliary = #888888, Border/Dashed line = #E0E0E0.83- Distinguish by brightness of blue (#1976D2 ↔ #E8F4FB), do not increase new colors.84- Vermilion #D84315 is for emphasis keywords only (Do not use for solid fills). Fix color meanings across all pages (Blue = Own company/Positive, Gray = Neutral, Vermilion = Issue/Decrease).8586## Shapes/Cards (White background + borders are basic. Fills are minimal)87- Use white background + #E0E0E0 hairline borders (0.75-1.5pt) as the base. No shadows.88- Limit #E8F4FB solid fill to "the one block you want to emphasize most" (overuse looks like a template).89- Use cards only for grouping parallel elements (do not abuse just to divide areas).90- If using rounded corners, unify the radius strictly everywhere (small). Right angles are also acceptable. Inconsistent roundness is strictly prohibited.9192## Bullet Points/Numbers93- Do not make the main part of the slide a list of bullet points (always structure). Only use lists for supplementary enumeration within a structure, using dashes "–" or no symbol with indentation, up to 2 levels of nesting. Prohibit decorative/emoji bullets.94- Use circled numbers ①②③ for steps, procedures, and corresponding items (Number badges are #1976D2, do not abuse as decoration).9596## Sources/Footnotes97- For numbers/data, include the source (origin, period) in small text (#888888) at the bottom of the slide. Do not post numbers without sources.98- Footnotes use superscript numbers in the body + 1-to-1 correspondence at the bottom. Align digits for chapter/page numbers (01, 02...).99100## Arrows/Lines/Connectors101- Unify arrow thickness and arrowhead size across all slides. Lines are thin at 0.75-1.5pt, #E0E0E0 or #1976D2.102- Give meaning to dotted/dashed lines (omission, prediction, weak relationship, etc.). Dashed lines are #E0E0E0.103- Unify connectors as L-shaped or straight. Align flow direction (Left → Right, Top → Bottom), do not reverse or cross.104105## Icons (Do not use in principle)106- In principle, do not use icons. Consultant documents show with text, borders, arrows, and numbers (Icons are the source of a template/amateur feel).107- Only if the meaning is uniquely determined and truly necessary, add exceptionally in tiny, single color (#1976D2 or Gray). Prohibit decorative icons, emojis, 3D, and multi-colors.108109## Tables110- No vertical borders, only horizontal borders (#E0E0E0) (Prohibit grid-like solid borders).111- Only the header row gets a #1976D2 bar or #E8F4FB light fill + bold.112- Numbers are right-aligned with unified digits, decimals, and units. Text is left-aligned. Units in column headings in parentheses (e.g., "Sales (Million Yen)").113114## Graphs115- All 2D flat (3D prohibited). Prioritize 100% stacked horizontal bars for composition (Pie charts up to 3 segments).116- Axis lines, scales, and grid lines are minimal and thin in #E0E0E0 (Do not enclose in a box).117- Direct labels rather than legends. Only the emphasized series is #1976D2 (or #D84315), others are #888888.118- Display data labels directly. Verbalize differences (e.g., "-60%"). Bars start at origin zero. Unify digits, units, and scales across all graphs.119120# Color Palette (Strictly 6 colors)121- Main Blue: #1976D2 / Accent Vermilion: #D84315 / Light Blue: #E8F4FB122- Body Dark Gray: #222222 / Sub Gray: #888888 / Border Gray: #E0E0E0 / Background: Pure White #FFFFFF123124# Pre-output Check (Pass all items)125[Content/Structure]126- Has it reverted to a list of bullet points? (Is it one of the 6 structures or an optimal diagram?)127- Is the head message a single sentence conclusion? (Not a noun ending or "About...") / Can it go as far as an implication?128- Does the diagram below prove the claim in the head message? (Consistency between head and diagram)129- Is it one message per slide? / Are facts and implications separated?130- Is original information kept and no facts added? / Is there no repetition of the same words? / Are 3 axes not packed in?131- Are sources (origin, period) attached to numerical values?132[Design]133- Is the background pure white? Are shadows/gradients/3D/bevels/glows not used?134- Are only the 6 palette colors used? / Is Vermilion #D84315 only for 1-2 emphases? / Is emphasis less than 10% of the screen?135- Are icons not used? (If used, are they tiny/exceptional?) / Is it centered on white background + borders rather than solid fills?136- Is the card corner radius (if used) unified everywhere and without shadows?137- Is the table centered on horizontal borders, numbers right-aligned, and units unified? / Is the graph 2D, direct labels, and origin zero?138- Are font (Noto Sans JP), size hierarchy, line spacing, margins, endings, and units unified across all pages?139- Is it grid-aligned, equal spacing, and unified margins? / Is it not all bold or all center-aligned?140[Final Polish]141- Can a first-time viewer of this slide state the claim in 3 seconds? (If not, restructure the head and structure)142- Is all Japanese text displayed accurately?
Step 3: If you want to edit the slide
If you want to edit just a little, throw the editing instructions directly to the AI.

If you want to change details yourself, please check the PPT conversion prompt in the following X article. (It's an X article that got 8,300 bookmarks)
The 3 reasons why this prompt works
The difference between just asking to "make it pretty" and this prompt.
This is where it works:
① It forces the conversion of bullet points into "structure"
If you normally ask to "remake it," the AI will return the bullet points as bullet points, just with color. That's a cleanup, not a remake. So, we bind it with "Lists are prohibited; restructure into one of the 6 structures (Sequence, Comparison, Classification, Problem Solving, Causality, Pyramid)." This is how it becomes a "page that communicates."
② It makes it "subtract" rather than add
It might be surprising, but the reason consultant documents look high-quality is that they "don't add." No icons. Reduced solid fills. Wide margins. The prompt includes "Decorative icons are prohibited in principle, fills are minimal, and if you want to add, first subtract." It's subtraction, not addition. This alone instantly gives it an "authentic" texture.
③ It makes it say the "So What"
Hard-to-read documents end with a list of facts. Easy-to-understand documents write as far as "what can be said because of that." The prompt makes the heading a single sentence conclusion rather than "About...," and draws out implications from there. This is the dividing line between good and bad documents.
For those who want to raise the quality even more
From here on, it's for those who want to push it further.
Want to reproduce the original material more precisely?
If you feel the one-shot generation is rough, use a two-stage approach. First, ask to "design only the structure and layout in text first," and after checking, say "now make it into an image with this design." Reproducibility will increase.
Want to output multiple pages at once?
Just change the number of output pages in the prompt. However, since 1 slide = 1 time comes out the cleanest, try it with just one page first.
Not just remakes, you can generate cool documents just by putting in text information like transcriptions
Just put in text like transcriptions here.

↓

Finally
Thank you for reading.
From now on, I will post centered on:
- AI x Documents
- Tips for document creation
- AI x Business utilization
- Automated email replies
- Automated quote creation
- Salesforce automatic input
- Automation of pre-meeting preparation
- AI used: Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini / Copilot, etc.
Thank you for your support.





