Review Topic AI - Slow Teacher
Review Topic AI - Slow Teacher
Showcase
Description
Want to write a review but can't decide on a topic? This AI tool uses Deep Research (or other search tools) combined with top journal hotspots and investment reports to lock in forward-looking review topics with both trending appeal and financial potential in three steps. A must-have for researchers aiming for top journals. Click to receive high-impact recommendations.
Recommended by
Nico@YouMind
Why we love this skill
This AI review topic tool uniquely combines top journal hot topics and investment reports to help you find forward-looking topics with both academic value and industrial prospects. Essential for researchers targeting top journals.
Related Skills
View all
慢老师 Review T+D Topic Picks
This is an intelligent tool designed specifically for researchers to choose a topic before writing a review. After you directly provide a research field (e.g., 'Electrochemical Energy Storage', 'Protein Structure Prediction', 'AI for Science', etc.), the skill systematically retrieves high-impact reviews, latest research hotspots, and research gap literature from the past 3-5 years. Strictly based on Professor Man's established T+D innovation paradigm (T = Innovation Themes: methods/structures/materials/mechanisms/systems/performances; D = Innovation Directions: time dimension/summary method/new framework integration), it recommends 3-5 review writing directions with the highest innovative potential.
WriteEnd-First Humanities Proposals
The biggest risk in a proposal isn’t writing slowly—it’s heading in the wrong direction. Most methods have you “write from start to finish, following the research process.” This Skill takes the opposite approach—backward first, then forward: it pushes you to clarify “what exactly is the innovation,” then work backward from the reviewers’ perspective to determine “what needs to be shown and why they should believe you.” Only after that does it have you write in a logical reading order. It sets three hard gates: you can’t lock in a topic until you’ve searched the literature thoroughly, you can’t start writing until the innovation is clear, and the final draft can’t be completed without your confirmation. It also uses XYZ multi-axis searches to verify that a “research gap” truly exists—never treating “I didn’t find it” as “no one has studied it.” Other AI helps you write faster. This Skill has you start later, so you get it right the first time.
ResearchProf. Man's Innovation Eval
This skill is a complete replication of Professor Man's (Professor Man's Research World) 2025 released world-class prompt for 'Multi-dimensional Innovation Assessment of Top Journal SCI Papers'. After entering the paper title, core scientific question, core innovation strategy, and sub-innovation points, it automatically performs deconstruction of six innovation types, literature comparison benchmarking, multi-dimensional scoring (novelty, importance, transcendence, logic), and generates a complete evaluation report including a one-sentence conclusion, radar chart scores, strengths & risks analysis, submission suggestions, and Cover Letter phrasing. Suitable for researchers aiming for top journals such as Nature, Science, Nat. Energy, Joule, Adv. Mater., etc., to accurately diagnose innovation before submission and avoid blind submissions. Trigger words: top journal innovation assessment, SCI innovation evaluation, Professor Man innovation evaluation, Nature
Information
- Version
- v3
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
