30天内容排期｜按时间预算安排制作与发布
结合现有材料和每周产能，安排30个自然日并核对依赖
30天内容排期｜按时间预算安排制作与发布
结合现有材料和每周产能，安排30个自然日并核对依赖
Showcase
Description
适合有主题和材料，但难以持续安排内容制作的创作者或小团队。 提供：主题、受众、渠道、开始日期和时区、每周可用时间、最多发布次数、不可发布日及现有材料。 处理：归纳材料与主题，先核每周产能，再安排制作、核对、发布、复用和休息。日期连续、稿件先做后发，预算不足会减少发布数量或列出资源缺口，不把30天当成必须发30篇。 交付：完整30天日历、周预算汇总、素材与复用依赖、发布前检查与复盘说明。支持文件时另给CSV，否则提供完整可复制表格与CSV文本。工作分钟为计划估算，不是实际耗时。 使用：说明起始日与可用时间，核对假设后按自己的实际情况执行；发布与补素材完成后再更新状态。 依赖：文字模型，推荐GPT，具体版本由平台选择。核心不需图片API或发布账号权限。四张展示图来自本地按最终技能真实执行的虚构排期案例，涵盖低频制作、跨年、每周三篇和活动未定；已检查连续30日期、每周预算、禁发日及前置关系。 未追加YouMind运行测试，未验证持久模型绑定。交付排期，不包含30篇完整正文、图片、自动发布或定时任务；不编造热度、平台最佳发布时间、客户成绩或收益承诺，平台运行模型费用另计。 展示说明：首张为独立技能头像与案例01实际输出的并排排版，用于横向缩略展示；不是新增案例，也未让生图模型重绘证据。其余三张对应案例02—04。
Recommended by
Dancang
Why we love this skill
Breaks down 30 days into actionable daily schedules rather than mechanically forcing 30 content pieces. It centers on time budgets and posting limits, strictly verifying material dependencies, production order, blackout dates, and topic repetition to make practical trade-offs when resources are tight.
Related Skills
View all
Write一稿多平台内容包｜同源四版文案
适用人群：已有文章、笔记或产品更新，需要改编为多个渠道文案的创作者。 你需要提供：原稿、目标读者与平台、语气、必留表达和已确认的行动入口。 如何处理：提取同源事实与限制，再分别组织公众号纯文字摘要、小红书分页脚本、X中文短帖和短视频口播稿，逐版核对数字、归属与完成状态。 最终交付：四版可复制文案、跨版事实一致性表、待补信息与使用说明。小红书默认4页文字脚本；口播仅文字和估算时长，不包含成图、配音、视频成片或公众号HTML排版。材料不足时缩短，不编造信息凑篇幅。 使用：粘贴原稿并说明平台与用途；阅读各版及核对表，补足事实与发布入口，再按对应平台要求使用。 核心只需文字模型，推荐GPT，具体版本由平台选择，不需要图片API或自动发布权限。封面为ImageGen原创概念视觉，不是Skill运行结果。四张展示图为本地GPT主代理按最终技能实际生成的虚构案例文本节选，经排版呈现；未发布到其他平台，也未追加YouMind积分测试。结果受输入与模型影响，仍需人工核对。 不适用：编造亲身经历、客户成果、促销或流量数据；不自动登录、排期、发布，不保证涨粉、转化或审核通过。 展示说明：首张为独立技能头像与案例01实际输出的并排排版，用于横向缩略展示；不是新增案例，也未让生图模型重绘证据。其余三张对应案例02—04。
WriteNotes to Article with Checklist
Target Audience: Creators who already have scattered notes, interview texts, or oral transcripts and want to organize them into articles. What You Need to Provide: Raw materials, target audience, purpose, length, and expressions you wish to keep. How It Works: Number the materials, distinguishing between factual statements, opinions, and plans; draft around a central thread, then re-check numbers, speakers, and evidence gaps. Final Delivery: 3 headline options, complete Chinese text, material correspondence table, and items to confirm with editing notes. Directly outputs copyable text by default; file saving depends on the runtime environment. Steps to Use: Paste materials and specify the audience and word count; read the article after running, check materials against the correspondence table, and revise before use. The core feature only requires a text model, GPT is recommended; current YouMind tests use GPT-6.1 Sol, and actual results depend on runtime configuration. The four display images are excerpts from real local Skill test outputs with fictitious inputs, formatted for presentation and not real customer cases; phrasing issues found in tests have been archived, and articles still require manual verification. The platform has completed one text case test, which does not guarantee stable success in all scenarios. Not Suitable For: Generating genuine interviews out of thin air, providing unprovided personal experiences, replacing fact-checking, or automatic publishing. Insufficient materials will shorten the content and list gaps without expanding to fabricate facts. Display Note: The first image shows a side-by-side layout of the independent Skill avatar and the actual output of case 01 for horizontal thumbnail display; it is not a new case, nor did an image-generation model redraw the evidence. The other three correspond to cases 02 through 04.
ResearchCompetitor Content Strategy
Turn content from competitor or benchmark accounts into an evidence-based, appropriately scoped content strategy report that you can put into action. Whether you provide local materials, article links, pasted text, or only an account name, the analysis can first build a source inventory, check sample coverage, time span, column and format distribution, and flag failed retrievals, missing information, or insufficient samples to avoid drawing overly certain conclusions from limited evidence. From there, it breaks down the benchmark account's topic angles, headline construction, opening promise, body pacing, and closing actions. It extracts reusable topic patterns, headline formulas, and structural frameworks while distinguishing consistently recurring tactics from isolated examples. The analysis goes beyond general judgments such as “worth learning from.” It considers your account positioning, platform format, stage, production capacity, category, and compliance boundaries to determine what can be adopted directly, what needs to be adapted, and what risks may come from copying it. It also provides practical adaptation directions and an action checklist for this week. If you provide content from your own account, the analysis can further compare it with your existing style, capability gaps, and audience expectations, then arrange a more suitable order for transferring applicable approaches. In the end, you can receive a conversation overview and a complete content strategy report. When needed, it can also generate a single-file HTML report that is easy to save, print, and share. Suitable for content creators, social media operators, and brand teams conducting competitor content analysis, planning topics, and building an account system.
Information
- Version
- v4
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
