One Source, Five Formats
One piece into doc, slides, cast, webpage and social
One Source, Five Formats
One piece into doc, slides, cast, webpage and social
Showcase
Description
YouMind can produce a document, a slide deck, a narrated video, an interactive webpage and a set of social posts. Most people use one of them, because doing all five by hand means writing the same argument five times and watching it drift a little further each time. This skill stops the drift by refusing to start until you have a spine. Before anything is generated it writes a Message Spine: one thesis under 25 words, three load-bearing points, the single strongest piece of evidence, the one image a reader should still have tomorrow, the change you want in them, and who this is explicitly not for. You approve it. Every format is then built from the spine, never from the previous format, so nothing compounds an earlier compromise. Then it tells you which formats are actually worth making. A short reflective essay makes bad slides. A dense data teardown makes bad audio. It will recommend two formats and explain why the other three would weaken the work, which is the opposite of what a content-multiplier is supposed to say. Each format gets built to its own rules, one at a time, with your confirmation. Slides get one idea per slide and speaker notes that carry the argument. The cast script is written for the ear, with numbers rounded and given a comparison and a deliberate pause before the strongest evidence. The webpage gets exactly one interactive move the flat text could not do. The social set opens each post on a different point so it does not read as three copies of itself, and every post gives away something real instead of begging for a click. One palette, one type treatment, one recurring motif, decided in writing before the first image is generated. You finish with a ship sheet: what goes where, in what order, how many days apart, with what call to action, and the one signal to watch. Plus a consistency check that quotes the thesis sentence from every format and confirms they still agree. It estimates credits before it spends them and never renders a full cast or image set without an explicit yes.
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Featured for turning one strong source into a coherent release system, not five recycled summaries. Its approved Message Spine, format-by-format recommendations, visual continuity, credit-aware previews, and final consistency check preserve the argument while adapting it intelligently to each medium.
Related Skills
View all
WebpageExplorable Explainer Page Builder
A report explains. A page lets people find out for themselves. YouMind can already build webpages. Explorable Explainer decides what to build — it turns a piece of research, a dataset or a topic into a single interactive page in the tradition of newsroom graphics and explorable explanations: scroll-driven narrative, real charts, controls you can move, sources you can check. It plans before it codes. You approve a build plan first: the one question the page answers, the reveal — the moment the reader should feel "oh" — a five to eight section scroll spine, two to four interactions each justified by what the reader learns from moving it, and a data contract listing every number and where it came from. Then it builds one self-contained HTML file with no build step. Semantic markup. All numbers in a single editable DATA constant at the top. Scroll reveals that do not break on a phone. Every control a real, keyboard-operable form element with live text describing its current value. Accessibility is built in rather than bolted on: 4.5:1 contrast, visible focus rings, alt text everywhere, no meaning carried by colour alone, reduced-motion respected, responsive from 360px. Before handing over, it runs a five-point self-review and reports the results honestly: does the reveal actually land, does the page still read with JavaScript off, is the tab order sane, is every number traceable, is anything animating that a reader would want to stop. Two rules it will not break: it never invents data to make a chart look good, and it tells you when your numbers contradict your draft. For researchers, analysts, journalists, educators, indie founders and consultants who want their work to be explored rather than skimmed.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Ship Check: Pre-Publish Audit
Everything you make in YouMind eventually leaves the building — as a document, a deck, a page, a cast or a post. Ship Check is the gate before it does. It is a single, unsentimental pass across the seven things that actually cause regret after publishing. Claim integrity: every factual, numerical, causal and comparative statement is quoted back to you and classified as sourced, unsourced, unsupportable, or opinion stated as fact — including the arithmetic, where it checks whether the parts sum to the total, whether a percentage has a stated base, and whether a comparison is missing its baseline. Attribution: quotes verbatim and correctly credited, images accounted for, data sourced, and every citation it cannot resolve flagged rather than assumed. Accessibility, which almost nothing else in the gallery covers: heading order, missing alt text (it writes it for you), link text that means something out of context, contrast, meaning carried by colour alone, missing captions and transcripts, table headers, focus order, and motion that ignores reduced-motion preferences. Readability: sentence and paragraph density, undefined jargon, reading level against your actual audience — plus full rewrites of the three worst passages. Structure, channel fit and risk: whether the opening earns the second paragraph, what gets truncated in the feed, and where you have wandered into defamation, unqualified medical or financial advice, privacy exposure, indefensible superlatives, or a disclosure you are required to make. You get a verdict, a scored table, and an issue list sorted Critical to Minor — each with the exact replacement text rather than a suggestion — plus a ten-minute version if that is all you have. It only reports what it can point at, it will not soften a Critical finding to be nice, and it will never tell you something is legally safe.
Information
- Version
- v4
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
