Professional Title Paper Evaluation and Submission Planner
Verify paper validity and plan compliant submissions
Professional Title Paper Evaluation and Submission Planner
Verify paper validity and plan compliant submissions
Showcase
Description
v1 solved where to submit, common pitfalls, and scheduling. Real pain points usually surface beforehand: people spend thousands and wait months only to have materials rejected because the paper isn't recognized—wrong author order, mismatched affiliations, missing database indexing, supplements, duplicate submissions, or high AIGC/plagiarism scores. ## Quick Summary **Verify whether the paper qualifies before choosing a journal.** Many people waste a year not from picking the wrong journal, but due to author rank, affiliation mismatch, unindexed issues, supplements, duplicate use, etc. v2 prioritizes 10 validity checks and eliminates AI-generated journal numbers and fees. ## What Changed from v1 to v2 | Dimension | v1.0.0 | v2.0.0 | | --- | --- | --- | | Priority | Journal Selection: Red/Yellow/Green lists | **10 Validity Checks**: Red flags stop journal selection | | Journal Data | Recommended 5-10 journals with CN/fees/cycles | **Never generated**: Verification portals + blank fields + confidence ratings | | Insufficient Time | Margin warning only | 4 alternative path decision trees | | After Rejection | None | 10 hard-hit rejection reviews + agency phrasing breakdown | Retained: Institutional requirements, red/yellow/green ratings, comparison tables, countdown schedules, 4-step verification, audit trails, and agency red lines. ## What You Will Get 1. **10 Validity Check Items**: Author rank, affiliation, relevance, time window, indexing, regular issues, plagiarism/AIGC, reuse, word count, negative list. 2. **Rank Check Items**: What intermediate, associate, and senior titles need to confirm with their institution. 3. **Hard Criteria Checklist**: Translates institutional terms into 6 actionable constraints. 4. **Candidate Journal Verification Sheet**: Official verification portals with blank fields to prevent fabrication. 5. **Decision & Countdown Tables**: Reverse-calculates deadlines, separating publication and indexing. 6. **Rejection Review & Agency Phrasing**: Evaluates claims like fast indexing or guaranteed approval with ready-to-use replies. 7. **4-Step Verification & Audit Trail**: Official filing, directory checks, issue comparison, and report packaging. ## Who This Is For - Teachers in primary/secondary schools or universities, and engineering, healthcare, agricultural, or research professionals. - **Those with a paper who are unsure if it qualifies.** - Anyone confused by agency recommendations or timeframes. - **Those whose materials were rejected last year.** - Previous v1 users: updated via this skill, replacing outdated journal lists. ## Why No Recommended Journal List Journal data constantly changes, and AI-generated numbers and fees are risky. v2 provides verification portals and rules so you can check official sites and editor offices—taking 5 minutes to prevent rejection. > Pure guidance format · No ghostwriting · Output editable intermediate assets.
Best for
Applicants with a paper who need to verify professional title requirements and plan a compliant publication path.
How to use this Skill
Provide your input
Provide your subject area, province, title series, rank, deadline, current manuscript details, and institutional evaluation guidelines.
Run the Skill
Evaluates manuscript validity against institutional rules, organizes journal selection criteria, verification items, timelines, and risks.
Review your result
Receive a validity assessment table, hard criteria checklist, journal verification sheet, publication schedule, and risk review.
Related Skills
View all
WriteProject Completion Material Generator
While the Social Science Fund Dual-Track Application Argumentation Generator handles applications, this skill handles completion. For university faculty, early-career researchers, and graduate students who have secured project approval, the most time-consuming part is often not the research itself, but the administrative paperwork: completion reports, achievement submissions, award materials, promotion forms, and CV entries. They have rigid formats, strict phrasing conventions, require the same achievement to be rewritten in three different ways, and are easily rejected over minor details like serial numbers, dates, or authorship. ## Quick Overview **Application approved? Don't let the paperwork block completion.** Turn your project approval info and achievement list into a completion report skeleton, three-angle achievement descriptions, scenario-based submission checklists, and a red-yellow-green self-check table. It provides structure and phrasing only, does not invent table fields or achievements, and does not guarantee review approval. ## What You Get 1. **Completion ID card and achievement inventory**: Align serial numbers, dates, members, and achievement counts at once, marking missing items as needs verification. 2. **One achievement, three angles**: Academic completion angle, award contribution angle, and CV/promotion entry angle, with traceable facts, phrasing, and evidence for each column. 3. **Six-section completion report skeleton**: Objective review, execution process, main conclusions, achievements and impact, funding and progress, and challenges and next steps, complete with writing points, customizable starting sentences, and common reasons for rejection. 4. **Scenario-based material checklist**: Common items for project completion, awards, promotions, CVs, and annual reviews, plus common format issues. 5. **Red-yellow-green self-check table**: Catch hard errors like inconsistent serial numbers, dates, or authorship first, with a printable version. 6. **Exaggerated phrasing replacement table**: Replace phrases like filling a gap or remarkable results with verifiable, review-friendly wording. ## Who It Is For - University faculty, early-career researchers, and project leaders: When projects are due for completion and you are worried about mismatched serial numbers, authorship, or achievements. - Graduate students and research assistants: Helping advisors organize achievement submissions, award applications, and annual review materials. - Previous users of the Social Science Fund Dual-Track Application Argumentation Generator: Moving naturally from application to completion.
ResearchTeacher Promotion Journal Screener
A journal selection and risk-screening assistant designed for primary, secondary, vocational, and university teachers publishing promotion papers. Triggered when a user provides a journal name or intermediary recommendation and asks questions about policy recognition, fake or duplicate journals, electronic journals, similarity thresholds, page fees, guaranteed publication claims by intermediaries, core journal requirements, SCD recognition, or database queries (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP). Uses the Four-Gate Selection Method (Verification, Inquiry, Targeting, Boundary) to output a journal selection checklist, provincial policy quick-reference card, and similarity/pitfall card. Does not ghostwrite or submit on your behalf. 1. Struggling to distinguish between real, fake, duplicate, or electronic journals for your promotion? Worried about intermediary scams, unrecognised publications, or failing similarity checks? This assistant uses the "Four-Gate Selection Method" to screen your journal options item by item. 2. Input your "province + school level + target level + journal name" to receive three core deliverables: ① Journal Selection Checklist (8 items to check off); ② Province Policy Quick-Reference Card (number of papers required, core requirements, recognition of SCD/electronic journals); ③ Similarity Red Line & Pitfall Card (similarity threshold, AIGC red lines, intermediary scam recognition tips). 3. No ghostwriting, no proxy submission, no guarantee of passing. Focuses strictly on identification and quality control. Policies are subject to official provincial/institutional documents of the reporting year, and outputs are marked "AI-assisted generation, please verify".
ResearchTitle Paper Submission Planner
Enter your academic field, province, title series and level, paper word count, budget, and title evaluation deadline to generate an actionable professional title paper submission plan. It includes a curated list of legitimate journals with red/yellow/green risk ratings, a submission decision comparison table, a countdown preparation table, and a plagiarism check and budget breakdown. It also features a built-in four-step verification guide for fake or duplicated journals and compliance warnings against writing agencies and proxy submissions. Suitable for university and K-12 faculty members, as well as researchers, engineers, healthcare workers, and agricultural professionals planning journal submissions for career advancement.
Information
- Version
- v3
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
- Use cases
- Writing & contentResearch & analysisCareer development
- What you get
- ReportDocumentPlan
