## Instruction Description

This command is used to generate a **concise and focused** personal training consultation summary report. Avoid excessive elaboration and repetition, and maintain the depth of core insights.

## Output Structure

### I. Progress

**Require:**

- Describe the visitor's current state in 2-4 sentences.

- Focus on core changes and key observations

- State objectively and avoid judgmental language.

### II. Challenges

**Require:**

- List 3-5 core questions

- Each problem contains: the surface manifestation of the problem + the underlying cause.

- Use **bold headings** to highlight types of confusion.

**Format:** **[Type of Confusion]:** **[Specific Manifestations] + [Underlying Reasons/Impacts]**

### III. Consultation Objectives

**Require:**

- Summarize the core objective of this consultation in 1-2 sentences.

- Clearly define "what we can help the visitor achieve".

### IV. Key Insights for Consultation ⭐️ Core Part

**Require:**

- Focus on 2-3 core topics (no more than 3)

- Structure of each topic: **Core Issue → Underlying Logic → Methodology → Core Insights**

- **Avoid over-elaboration:** Each topic should be limited to 300-500 words.

**Frame Structure:**

```

This consultation revolves around [N] core issues: [Issue 1] and [Issue 2].

### Agenda Item 1: [Agenda Name] - [Subtitle]

**Core Issue**: [Explain the essence of the issue in 1-2 sentences]

**Underlying Logic**: [Explain why this is the case and what the correct understanding is in 1-2 paragraphs]

**Methodology/Strategy**: [Provide specific, actionable methods, 3-5 key points are sufficient]

- Key Point 1

- Key Point 2

- Key Point 3

**Key Insight:** [A one-sentence summary of the key takeaways from this topic]

[Repeat the above structure to complete topic two]

```

**[Systematic Interrelationships Between Topics]**

- Use 1-2 paragraphs to explain how the various issues support each other.

- Describing the positive feedback loop mechanism

### V. Action Plan

**Require:**

- List 3-7 specific action items

- Grouped by timeline (this week/this month/this quarter)

- Each action: **[Action Name]**: **What to do specifically** + **Expected Outcome**

### VI. Core Insight

**Require:**

- 2-3 summary statements

- Paragraph 1: The Essence of the Core Challenge

- Second paragraph: Key changes the visitor needs to make (listed in bullet points)

- Third paragraph: Keywords + Vision description

---

## Writing Principles (Important!)

### 1. The Principle of Simplicity⭐️

- **Avoid overelaboration:** Don't expand every point into a lengthy discussion.

- **Avoid repetition:** Don't repeat the same points in different parts.

- **Avoid excessive examples:** Provide only one example per methodology; avoid listing multiple examples.

- **Controlling the length:** The overall report should be limited to 150-200 lines, and no more than 250 lines.

### 2. Focus Principle

Focus on 2-3 core issues; don't try to cover everything.

- Only the most crucial content of each topic will be discussed.

- The methodology should be specific and actionable, but not overly detailed.

### 3. Depth Principle

- While concise, maintain depth of insight.

- Revealing the underlying logic and essence

- Provide valuable cognitive breakthroughs

### 4. Readability Principle

- Use **bold** and bullet points to improve readability

- Clear structure and distinct layers

- Avoid piling up large blocks of text

### 5. Principle of Individualization

- Closely related to the visitor's specific situation

- Use the visitor's language and examples

- Avoid using template-based expressions

---

## Instructions for Use

1. **Input Requirements:** Provide a complete record of the consultation conversation.

2. **Processing Flow**:

- Identify 2-3 core issues (no more than 3)

- Extract the key points of each topic (avoid over-elaboration).

- Establish systematic connections between topics

- Organize content according to the template structure (to control the length)

3. **Output Requirements:** Generate a concise, focused, and in-depth consulting summary report.

---

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Is the overall length controlled within 150-250 lines?

Does the use of [ ] avoid over-expansion and repetition?

- [ ] Does each topic focus on the core issues and remain within 300-500 words?

Is the methodology [ ] specific and actionable, but not overly detailed?

- [ ] Did it maintain depth of insight?

Is the action plan specific and feasible?

- Are the core insights concise and impactful?

Is the overall design ([ ]) readable, focused, and valuable?