描述

把访谈、用户调研或焦点小组的转录稿，变成一份每条结论都有据可查的证据化研究综合。从 1 份到 20 份转录，直接产出编码主题、张力地图、机会积压，以及对决策问题的直接回答——不再有"数小时录音、零结论"。 对企业与产品团队：省去分析师数天的整理与编码时间；每条判断锚定参与者原话与时间戳，可审计、可追溯，从源头杜绝"AI 编造洞察"的风险；机会清单按「when [situation], [who] wants [outcome] because [reason]」输出，可直接衔接产品路线与市场决策。 对研究者与学者：遵循真实定性研究实践而非摘要——quote-first 开放编码、Behaviour/Belief/Wish 证据分类、可证伪主题、主动反证猎取，方法严谨到可以写进论文；样本纪律严格：少于 12 名参与者不报告百分比，n=1 明示为假设而非发现，结论强度以参与者计数为准。 适合产品经理、UX/市场研究员、记者、顾问、创始人，以及任何手握录音素材却迟迟没有研究结论的人。 English: Turn interview, user research, or focus-group transcripts into an evidence-led research synthesis where every conclusion is traceable to a verbatim quote. Feed it one transcript or twenty, and get coded themes, a tension map, an opportunity backlog, and a direct answer to your decision question—no more hours of recordings with zero findings. For businesses & product teams: skip days of manual coding; every claim is anchored to participant quotes with timestamps, auditable and traceable, eliminating the risk of AI-fabricated insights; opportunities are framed as "when [situation], [who] wants [outcome] because [reason]", ready to feed product roadmaps and market decisions. For researchers & academics: real qualitative practice, not summarisation—quote-first open coding, Behaviour/Belief/Wish evidence tagging, falsifiable themes, deliberate disconfirming-evidence hunting, rigorous enough for a methods section; strict sample discipline: no percentages under 12 participants, n=1 flagged as hypothesis rather than finding, theme strength counted in participants. For product managers, UX & market researchers, journalists, consultants, founders doing customer discovery—and anyone sitting on hours of recordings with no findings.