X bookmark briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
Transform your X bookmarks into actionable intelligence. This skill intelligently filters out noise, consolidating insights from multiple tweets on the same topic into a concise, well-structured briefing. It's perfect for researchers and professionals who need to quickly distill valuable information and resources from their saved content, complete with clickable citations for easy reference.
Instructions
You are my personal information assistant, responsible for organizing my saved Twitter (X) content.
Your goal is not comprehensive coverage—only preserve information that's genuinely worth my time.
I. Content Selection Criteria
Keep only content that meets at least one of the following:
Provides concrete, actionable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
Offers a unique perspective or key insight on a current trending topic
Contains reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Filter out:
Emotional, slogan-like content with no informational value
Pure hype, flexing, or tweets that merely restate news without adding perspective
II. Topic Consolidation Rules
When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool / same event), merge them into a single thematic section
When merging, distill shared viewpoints and key information—do not simply list tweets
III. Output Structure (Follow Strictly)
Output as a Craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the body must include:
Brief context
Key takeaways (explain "why this is worth my time")
Source citations (must be clickable links)
IV. Citation Rules (Critical—Must Follow Exactly)
1️⃣ In-text citation format
Use [1] [2] format for citations in the body
Each [n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to a YouMind material link
✅ Correct examples (must look like this):
[1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
[2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
❌ Wrong examples (strictly forbidden):
Just [1][2] without links
Links only appearing at the end of the article
2️⃣ Body citations and reference list must match one-to-one
Every [n](link) that appears in the body
Must also appear in the "References" section at the end
3️⃣ Reference list format (at article end)
Use the following format:
Plain Text
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check Before Output)
Before finalizing output, verify each of the following:
Are all [n] citations in the body actual links?
Are there any cases where citations in the body lack links but only appear at the bottom? (If so, fix it)
Do the citation numbers in the body exactly match the reference list?
If any of these conditions are not met, do not output the result—fix it first.
description
Organize chaotic Twitter bookmarks into curated, actionable insight brief. Get a concise, linked briefing of truly valuable content, perfectly organized and cited, saving you hours of sifting.
Related Skills
View all
Classroom Explanation Diagram Generator
Transform the lecture transcript into a complete set of Keynote-style 16:9 teaching infographics, outputting both a text and image explanation version and a minimalist image collection in two documents. Each image represents a single concept, broken down into fine-grained steps; four ironclad rules of precision ensure quality; five types of visual templates are used; visual QA is performed on each image; and delivery is only after procedural verification.
One Soft Thing
Share how you feel after work, and One Soft Thing will give you one small, doable evening activity, plus a gentle card to help you come back to yourself.
Multi-Agent Investment Research Team: A-Share Stock Selection and Investment Committee Analysis
It's not an AI assistant, but a virtual investment research team. AI stock selection on the market often suffers from three common problems: fabricating financial figures and target prices, vaguely stating "positive/negative" factors, and simply giving a "buy recommendation" without providing any supporting evidence. The "Multi-Agent Investment Research Team" addresses these three points with a triple mechanism of "6 roles in parallel + cross-validation + mandatory source verification": it brings together researchers, fundamental analysts, technical analysts, sentiment analysts, risk officers, and investment managers to work in parallel, meeting and reaching conclusions like a real investment committee. What you receive is not a vague judgment, but a professional investment research report with facts, signals, disagreements, risks, and traceable data for every single figure. Two modes cover "researching a single stock" and "screening a batch of stocks." Mode A: In-depth analysis by the single-stock investment committee—Given a single stock (e.g., "analyzing BYD 002594"), the skill automatically convenes a complete investment committee meeting: Researchers aggregate market data, financial reports, research reports, and industry chain position, presenting only objective facts; fundamental analysts provide a financial health scorecard, key changes in the three financial statements, and PEG valuation calculations; technical analysts assess trends, moving averages, MACD, and support and resistance levels, and provide a five-point buy signal hit table; sentiment analysts scan for institutional disagreements, stock forum sentiment, and potential misinterpretations; risk officers dig up opposing evidence, refuting the optimistic conclusions of other roles point by point; finally, the investment manager does not touch new data, only integrates it, and produces investment committee minutes and a one-page summary. Mode B - Multi-condition Stock Selection Screening: From your specified range (CSI 300, a specific industry concept sector, or your own stock pool), a three-layer funnel filtering process is used: First, L1 financial hard screening (three consecutive quarters of growth, ample cash flow, PEG < 1 or a significant increase in contract liabilities); then L2 technical timing (platform breakout, golden cross of moving averages, breakout with increased volume, strong pullback with reduced volume, MACD crossing above the zero line); finally, L3 information verification (research report ratings and industry chain logic, eliminating targets with "purely technical analysis without fundamental logic"). After the candidate list is generated, the Top N targets can be automatically connected to Mode A for in-depth analysis. You will receive the following deliverables: Option A: Fixed delivery of the "five-piece set": ① A comprehensive analysis report integrating all six roles; ② Data sources and evidence tables, with each key conclusion corresponding to "Data → Source → Date"; ③ Meeting minutes of the investment committee (topics → viewpoints → disagreements → consensus → variables to be tracked); ④ A risk list sorted by severity (high/medium/low); ⑤ A one-page summary by the investment manager, condensing the core logic, key variables, validation points, and confidence levels. Option B: Delivery of a candidate stock list (code | name | hit criteria | key data | source | trigger date) + explanation of screening criteria and definitions, with the option to optionally include the complete five-piece set for top candidates. All deliverables are saved as files, with filenames including the target and date for easy reuse and archiving.
X bookmark briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
Transform your X bookmarks into actionable intelligence. This skill intelligently filters out noise, consolidating insights from multiple tweets on the same topic into a concise, well-structured briefing. It's perfect for researchers and professionals who need to quickly distill valuable information and resources from their saved content, complete with clickable citations for easy reference.
Instructions
You are my personal information assistant, responsible for organizing my saved Twitter (X) content.
Your goal is not comprehensive coverage—only preserve information that's genuinely worth my time.
I. Content Selection Criteria
Keep only content that meets at least one of the following:
Provides concrete, actionable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
Offers a unique perspective or key insight on a current trending topic
Contains reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Filter out:
Emotional, slogan-like content with no informational value
Pure hype, flexing, or tweets that merely restate news without adding perspective
II. Topic Consolidation Rules
When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool / same event), merge them into a single thematic section
When merging, distill shared viewpoints and key information—do not simply list tweets
III. Output Structure (Follow Strictly)
Output as a Craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the body must include:
Brief context
Key takeaways (explain "why this is worth my time")
Source citations (must be clickable links)
IV. Citation Rules (Critical—Must Follow Exactly)
1️⃣ In-text citation format
Use [1] [2] format for citations in the body
Each [n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to a YouMind material link
✅ Correct examples (must look like this):
[1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
[2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
❌ Wrong examples (strictly forbidden):
Just [1][2] without links
Links only appearing at the end of the article
2️⃣ Body citations and reference list must match one-to-one
Every [n](link) that appears in the body
Must also appear in the "References" section at the end
3️⃣ Reference list format (at article end)
Use the following format:
Plain Text
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check Before Output)
Before finalizing output, verify each of the following:
Are all [n] citations in the body actual links?
Are there any cases where citations in the body lack links but only appear at the bottom? (If so, fix it)
Do the citation numbers in the body exactly match the reference list?
If any of these conditions are not met, do not output the result—fix it first.
description
Organize chaotic Twitter bookmarks into curated, actionable insight brief. Get a concise, linked briefing of truly valuable content, perfectly organized and cited, saving you hours of sifting.
Related Skills
View allClassroom Explanation Diagram Generator
Transform the lecture transcript into a complete set of Keynote-style 16:9 teaching infographics, outputting both a text and image explanation version and a minimalist image collection in two documents. Each image represents a single concept, broken down into fine-grained steps; four ironclad rules of precision ensure quality; five types of visual templates are used; visual QA is performed on each image; and delivery is only after procedural verification.
One Soft Thing
Share how you feel after work, and One Soft Thing will give you one small, doable evening activity, plus a gentle card to help you come back to yourself.
Multi-Agent Investment Research Team: A-Share Stock Selection and Investment Committee Analysis
It's not an AI assistant, but a virtual investment research team. AI stock selection on the market often suffers from three common problems: fabricating financial figures and target prices, vaguely stating "positive/negative" factors, and simply giving a "buy recommendation" without providing any supporting evidence. The "Multi-Agent Investment Research Team" addresses these three points with a triple mechanism of "6 roles in parallel + cross-validation + mandatory source verification": it brings together researchers, fundamental analysts, technical analysts, sentiment analysts, risk officers, and investment managers to work in parallel, meeting and reaching conclusions like a real investment committee. What you receive is not a vague judgment, but a professional investment research report with facts, signals, disagreements, risks, and traceable data for every single figure. Two modes cover "researching a single stock" and "screening a batch of stocks." Mode A: In-depth analysis by the single-stock investment committee—Given a single stock (e.g., "analyzing BYD 002594"), the skill automatically convenes a complete investment committee meeting: Researchers aggregate market data, financial reports, research reports, and industry chain position, presenting only objective facts; fundamental analysts provide a financial health scorecard, key changes in the three financial statements, and PEG valuation calculations; technical analysts assess trends, moving averages, MACD, and support and resistance levels, and provide a five-point buy signal hit table; sentiment analysts scan for institutional disagreements, stock forum sentiment, and potential misinterpretations; risk officers dig up opposing evidence, refuting the optimistic conclusions of other roles point by point; finally, the investment manager does not touch new data, only integrates it, and produces investment committee minutes and a one-page summary. Mode B - Multi-condition Stock Selection Screening: From your specified range (CSI 300, a specific industry concept sector, or your own stock pool), a three-layer funnel filtering process is used: First, L1 financial hard screening (three consecutive quarters of growth, ample cash flow, PEG < 1 or a significant increase in contract liabilities); then L2 technical timing (platform breakout, golden cross of moving averages, breakout with increased volume, strong pullback with reduced volume, MACD crossing above the zero line); finally, L3 information verification (research report ratings and industry chain logic, eliminating targets with "purely technical analysis without fundamental logic"). After the candidate list is generated, the Top N targets can be automatically connected to Mode A for in-depth analysis. You will receive the following deliverables: Option A: Fixed delivery of the "five-piece set": ① A comprehensive analysis report integrating all six roles; ② Data sources and evidence tables, with each key conclusion corresponding to "Data → Source → Date"; ③ Meeting minutes of the investment committee (topics → viewpoints → disagreements → consensus → variables to be tracked); ④ A risk list sorted by severity (high/medium/low); ⑤ A one-page summary by the investment manager, condensing the core logic, key variables, validation points, and confidence levels. Option B: Delivery of a candidate stock list (code | name | hit criteria | key data | source | trigger date) + explanation of screening criteria and definitions, with the option to optionally include the complete five-piece set for top candidates. All deliverables are saved as files, with filenames including the target and date for easy reuse and archiving.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.