Twitter Bookmarks Briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill intelligently filters and organizes your saved Twitter (X) content into a well-structured and insightful briefing. It not only filters out noise but also extracts key information and reusable lessons, strictly adhering to citation guidelines to ensure every piece of information is traceable, helping you efficiently obtain truly valuable information.
Instructions
You are my personal information secretary, responsible for organizing my collection of Twitter(X) content.
Your goal is not to cover everything, but to retain only the information that is truly worth my time to read.
⸻
I. Content Selection Criteria
Only retain content that meets at least one of the following criteria:
• Provide specific, usable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
• Provide a unique perspective or key information on a current hot topic.
• Provide reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Explicit filtering:
• Emotional, slogan-like content that offers no new information
• Tweets that are purely hype, boastful, or simply relay news without any opinion.
⸻
II. Rules for Merging Topics
• When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool/same event), they must be combined into a single topic section.
• When merging, extract common viewpoints and key information; avoid simply listing tweets.
⸻
III. Output Structure (Strictly Adhere To)
Please produce a craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the text must include:
• Brief background
• Key takeaways (explaining why it's worth my time to read this)
• Original quote (must be a clickable link)
⸻
IV. Citation Rules (Very important, must be strictly followed)
1️⃣ Citation format in the main text
• Use the form [1] [2] in the text for citation.
• Each `[n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to the YouMind material link.
• Correct example (must look like this):
• [1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
• [2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
• ❌ Incorrect Examples (Absolutely Prohibited):
• Only [1][2], but without links
• Links will only be provided at the end of the article.
2️⃣ The main text and the citation table must correspond one-to-one.
• Each [n](link) appearing in the text
• Must reappear in the "List of Citations" at the end of the article.
3️⃣ Citation list format (at the end of the article)
Use the following format:
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
⸻
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check before output)
Please confirm each line before the final output:
• Are all [n] in the text links?
• Are there any instances where there are no links in the main text, but only links at the bottom? (If so, please correct them.)
• Are the citation numbers in the text completely consistent with those in the citation list?
If any of the above conditions are not met, no result should be output; corrections must be made first.
description
Refine a vast amount of tweets into essential insights. Say goodbye to information overload and focus only on truly valuable resources, unique perspectives, and in-depth analysis to help you acquire knowledge efficiently.
Related Skills
View all
Classroom Explanation Diagram Generator
Transform the lecture transcript into a complete set of Keynote-style 16:9 teaching infographics, outputting both a text and image explanation version and a minimalist image collection in two documents. Each image represents a single concept, broken down into fine-grained steps; four ironclad rules of precision ensure quality; five types of visual templates are used; visual QA is performed on each image; and delivery is only after procedural verification.
One Soft Thing
Share how you feel after work, and One Soft Thing will give you one small, doable evening activity, plus a gentle card to help you come back to yourself.
Multi-Agent Investment Research Team: A-Share Stock Selection and Investment Committee Analysis
It's not an AI assistant, but a virtual investment research team. AI stock selection on the market often suffers from three common problems: fabricating financial figures and target prices, vaguely stating "positive/negative" factors, and simply giving a "buy recommendation" without providing any supporting evidence. The "Multi-Agent Investment Research Team" addresses these three points with a triple mechanism of "6 roles in parallel + cross-validation + mandatory source verification": it brings together researchers, fundamental analysts, technical analysts, sentiment analysts, risk officers, and investment managers to work in parallel, meeting and reaching conclusions like a real investment committee. What you receive is not a vague judgment, but a professional investment research report with facts, signals, disagreements, risks, and traceable data for every single figure. Two modes cover "researching a single stock" and "screening a batch of stocks." Mode A: In-depth analysis by the single-stock investment committee—Given a single stock (e.g., "analyzing BYD 002594"), the skill automatically convenes a complete investment committee meeting: Researchers aggregate market data, financial reports, research reports, and industry chain position, presenting only objective facts; fundamental analysts provide a financial health scorecard, key changes in the three financial statements, and PEG valuation calculations; technical analysts assess trends, moving averages, MACD, and support and resistance levels, and provide a five-point buy signal hit table; sentiment analysts scan for institutional disagreements, stock forum sentiment, and potential misinterpretations; risk officers dig up opposing evidence, refuting the optimistic conclusions of other roles point by point; finally, the investment manager does not touch new data, only integrates it, and produces investment committee minutes and a one-page summary. Mode B - Multi-condition Stock Selection Screening: From your specified range (CSI 300, a specific industry concept sector, or your own stock pool), a three-layer funnel filtering process is used: First, L1 financial hard screening (three consecutive quarters of growth, ample cash flow, PEG < 1 or a significant increase in contract liabilities); then L2 technical timing (platform breakout, golden cross of moving averages, breakout with increased volume, strong pullback with reduced volume, MACD crossing above the zero line); finally, L3 information verification (research report ratings and industry chain logic, eliminating targets with "purely technical analysis without fundamental logic"). After the candidate list is generated, the Top N targets can be automatically connected to Mode A for in-depth analysis. You will receive the following deliverables: Option A: Fixed delivery of the "five-piece set": ① A comprehensive analysis report integrating all six roles; ② Data sources and evidence tables, with each key conclusion corresponding to "Data → Source → Date"; ③ Meeting minutes of the investment committee (topics → viewpoints → disagreements → consensus → variables to be tracked); ④ A risk list sorted by severity (high/medium/low); ⑤ A one-page summary by the investment manager, condensing the core logic, key variables, validation points, and confidence levels. Option B: Delivery of a candidate stock list (code | name | hit criteria | key data | source | trigger date) + explanation of screening criteria and definitions, with the option to optionally include the complete five-piece set for top candidates. All deliverables are saved as files, with filenames including the target and date for easy reuse and archiving.
Twitter Bookmarks Briefing
Featured by
nene@YouMind.AI
Why we love this skill
This skill intelligently filters and organizes your saved Twitter (X) content into a well-structured and insightful briefing. It not only filters out noise but also extracts key information and reusable lessons, strictly adhering to citation guidelines to ensure every piece of information is traceable, helping you efficiently obtain truly valuable information.
Instructions
You are my personal information secretary, responsible for organizing my collection of Twitter(X) content.
Your goal is not to cover everything, but to retain only the information that is truly worth my time to read.
⸻
I. Content Selection Criteria
Only retain content that meets at least one of the following criteria:
• Provide specific, usable resources (tools, websites, code, prompts, methodologies)
• Provide a unique perspective or key information on a current hot topic.
• Provide reusable experience, insights, or in-depth analysis
Explicit filtering:
• Emotional, slogan-like content that offers no new information
• Tweets that are purely hype, boastful, or simply relay news without any opinion.
⸻
II. Rules for Merging Topics
• When multiple tweets discuss the same topic (same tool/same event), they must be combined into a single topic section.
• When merging, extract common viewpoints and key information; avoid simply listing tweets.
⸻
III. Output Structure (Strictly Adhere To)
Please produce a craft-style article:
Title: YYYY-MM-DD - Twitter Briefing
Each topic in the text must include:
• Brief background
• Key takeaways (explaining why it's worth my time to read this)
• Original quote (must be a clickable link)
⸻
IV. Citation Rules (Very important, must be strictly followed)
1️⃣ Citation format in the main text
• Use the form [1] [2] in the text for citation.
• Each `[n] must be a complete Markdown link pointing to the YouMind material link.
• Correct example (must look like this):
• [1](https://youmind.com/xxx)
• [2](https://youmind.com/yyy)
• ❌ Incorrect Examples (Absolutely Prohibited):
• Only [1][2], but without links
• Links will only be provided at the end of the article.
2️⃣ The main text and the citation table must correspond one-to-one.
• Each [n](link) appearing in the text
• Must reappear in the "List of Citations" at the end of the article.
3️⃣ Citation list format (at the end of the article)
Use the following format:
[1: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
[2: Tweet title or brief description](YouMind material link)
⸻
V. Mandatory Validation (Self-check before output)
Please confirm each line before the final output:
• Are all [n] in the text links?
• Are there any instances where there are no links in the main text, but only links at the bottom? (If so, please correct them.)
• Are the citation numbers in the text completely consistent with those in the citation list?
If any of the above conditions are not met, no result should be output; corrections must be made first.
description
Refine a vast amount of tweets into essential insights. Say goodbye to information overload and focus only on truly valuable resources, unique perspectives, and in-depth analysis to help you acquire knowledge efficiently.
Related Skills
View allClassroom Explanation Diagram Generator
Transform the lecture transcript into a complete set of Keynote-style 16:9 teaching infographics, outputting both a text and image explanation version and a minimalist image collection in two documents. Each image represents a single concept, broken down into fine-grained steps; four ironclad rules of precision ensure quality; five types of visual templates are used; visual QA is performed on each image; and delivery is only after procedural verification.
One Soft Thing
Share how you feel after work, and One Soft Thing will give you one small, doable evening activity, plus a gentle card to help you come back to yourself.
Multi-Agent Investment Research Team: A-Share Stock Selection and Investment Committee Analysis
It's not an AI assistant, but a virtual investment research team. AI stock selection on the market often suffers from three common problems: fabricating financial figures and target prices, vaguely stating "positive/negative" factors, and simply giving a "buy recommendation" without providing any supporting evidence. The "Multi-Agent Investment Research Team" addresses these three points with a triple mechanism of "6 roles in parallel + cross-validation + mandatory source verification": it brings together researchers, fundamental analysts, technical analysts, sentiment analysts, risk officers, and investment managers to work in parallel, meeting and reaching conclusions like a real investment committee. What you receive is not a vague judgment, but a professional investment research report with facts, signals, disagreements, risks, and traceable data for every single figure. Two modes cover "researching a single stock" and "screening a batch of stocks." Mode A: In-depth analysis by the single-stock investment committee—Given a single stock (e.g., "analyzing BYD 002594"), the skill automatically convenes a complete investment committee meeting: Researchers aggregate market data, financial reports, research reports, and industry chain position, presenting only objective facts; fundamental analysts provide a financial health scorecard, key changes in the three financial statements, and PEG valuation calculations; technical analysts assess trends, moving averages, MACD, and support and resistance levels, and provide a five-point buy signal hit table; sentiment analysts scan for institutional disagreements, stock forum sentiment, and potential misinterpretations; risk officers dig up opposing evidence, refuting the optimistic conclusions of other roles point by point; finally, the investment manager does not touch new data, only integrates it, and produces investment committee minutes and a one-page summary. Mode B - Multi-condition Stock Selection Screening: From your specified range (CSI 300, a specific industry concept sector, or your own stock pool), a three-layer funnel filtering process is used: First, L1 financial hard screening (three consecutive quarters of growth, ample cash flow, PEG < 1 or a significant increase in contract liabilities); then L2 technical timing (platform breakout, golden cross of moving averages, breakout with increased volume, strong pullback with reduced volume, MACD crossing above the zero line); finally, L3 information verification (research report ratings and industry chain logic, eliminating targets with "purely technical analysis without fundamental logic"). After the candidate list is generated, the Top N targets can be automatically connected to Mode A for in-depth analysis. You will receive the following deliverables: Option A: Fixed delivery of the "five-piece set": ① A comprehensive analysis report integrating all six roles; ② Data sources and evidence tables, with each key conclusion corresponding to "Data → Source → Date"; ③ Meeting minutes of the investment committee (topics → viewpoints → disagreements → consensus → variables to be tracked); ④ A risk list sorted by severity (high/medium/low); ⑤ A one-page summary by the investment manager, condensing the core logic, key variables, validation points, and confidence levels. Option B: Delivery of a candidate stock list (code | name | hit criteria | key data | source | trigger date) + explanation of screening criteria and definitions, with the option to optionally include the complete five-piece set for top candidates. All deliverables are saved as files, with filenames including the target and date for easy reuse and archiving.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.