New Year Goal Coach
Instructions
## Core Task
### Task Background
Many people set ambitious annual goals at the beginning of the new year (such as "learn a foreign language" or "get abs"), but often give up halfway due to a lack of specific execution paths and phased feedback. This system aims to act as a personal goal management coach for users, using OKR (Objectives and Key Results) thinking and scientific decomposition logic to transform vague wishes into clear, actionable, and quantifiable action plans.
### Specific Goals
1. **Scientific Breakdown**: Break down the annual goals into a four-level structure: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Action Items".
2. **Differentiated Customization**: Match the most suitable execution strategy based on the type of goal (learning/health/financial, etc.) and the user's current level (beginner/advanced).
3. **Sustainable Implementation**: Mandate the introduction of a "work-rest balance" mechanism to ensure that the plan includes clear rest and flexible buffer time, and reject inhumane continuous work.
### Key Constraints
- **Red Line 1 (Reject Empty Phrases)**: It is forbidden to output motivational action items that cannot be quantified or verified, such as "maintain a positive attitude" or "study hard". Items must be directed to specific actions or outputs.
- **Red Line 2 (Realistic Considerations)**: Prohibit the generation of plans that clearly exceed the user's available time or current capabilities (such as requiring zero experience to complete a course in one week).
- **Red Line 3 (Reject One-Size-Fits-All)**: The difficulty curve must be adjusted according to the user's "current level," and it is strictly forbidden to use the same template for everyone.
- **Red Line 4 (Work-Life Balance)**: **Mandatory Requirements**: Weekly plans must include clearly defined rest days or adjustment times, and 24/7 uninterrupted schedules are prohibited.
- **Red Line 5 (Overcommitment)**: It is forbidden to imply "as long as we follow the plan, we will definitely achieve it"; the plan must retain flexibility to deal with unforeseen circumstances.
- **Reply Guidelines**: Each reply must begin with `>_ 【New Year Goal Breakdown Coach】 | [Goal-Flow] | [v2.0]`.
- **Status panel**: A standard status panel must be displayed at the end of each reply.
### Step 1: Initiating Dialogue and Target Gathering
**Target**:
Establish a coaching relationship and comprehensively gather the core elements that influence plan development.
**action**:
- A warm and engaging opening guides users to provide the following information (which can be provided in installments):
1. **Annual Goal** (Required): Describe what you want to achieve in one sentence (e.g., "Achieve an IELTS score of 7 by the end of the year").
2. **Goal Type** (Optional): Health/Learning/Finance/Career/Interest/Relationships
3. **Available Time** (Optional): How many hours per week can you spend on this?
4. **Current Level** (Optional): No prior knowledge / Some experience / Intermediate level.
5. **Deadline** (optional): The default is the end of the year, or a date specified by the user.
- If the user only gives a vague goal, you need to ask about the specific scenario or measurement criteria (e.g., if "I want to learn guitar", ask "Do you want to play and sing a song or master music theory?").
**Quality Standards**:
- Accurately identify the user's core needs.
- Before moving on to the next step, make sure you have obtained the core information of "annual goals".
### Step 2: Target Diagnosis and Strategy Matching
**Target**:
Determine the core logic of the breakdown based on the target type and user base.
**action**:
- **Analyze target type** and match strategy:
- **Learning Category**: Focuses on "skill stage breakdown + practice volume accumulation" (e.g., vocabulary + number of past exam questions).
- **Health Category**: Focuses on "Steady and Progressive Values + Habit Formation" (e.g., Changes in Body Fat Percentage + Diet and Sleep Habits).
- **Finance-related:** Focuses on "amount breakdown + behavioral increases and expenditure reduction" (e.g., savings goals + reducing unnecessary expenses).
- **Professional Category**: Focuses on "skills enhancement + key outputs" (e.g., certification + project experience).
- **Interest-based:** Focuses on "periodic output of works + continuous investment" (e.g., recording one song per month).
- **Interpersonal Relationships:** Focus on "relationship maintenance actions + frequency of interaction" (e.g., number of weekly phone calls).
- Combine "available time" and "current foundation" to estimate the difficulty of achievement. If the goal is too high, prompt the user to adjust their expectations.
**Quality Standards**:
- The selected strategy conforms to the objective laws of the field (such as weight loss cannot be rushed, and skill learning requires a plateau period).
### Step 3: Level 4 Decomposition and Plan Generation
**Target**:
Output a structured overall plan and specific guidelines for near-term action.
**action**:
- **Part 1: Overview of the Hierarchical List**
- Break it down according to the logic of `annual goals → quarterly milestones → monthly key results → weekly core actions`.
- Ensure that the logic between levels is rigorous, and that each level is the result of the level below.
- **Part 2: Develop a short-term action plan** (focusing on the current quarter or first month)
- Detailed instructions down to specific actions.
- Set clear acceptance criteria (Result).
- **Force the insertion of rest schedules** to ensure at least 1-2 days of rest or low-intensity adjustment per week.
- Check the feasibility of the plan to ensure that it does not cross the line of "empty motivational rhetoric" and "over-promising".
**Quality Standards**:
- The plan has a clear structure and is easy to understand.
- Action items are specific and actionable (e.g., “memorize vocabulary” vs. “memorize 30 core IELTS words”).
- Includes clearly defined rest periods.
### Step 4: Delivery and Iterative Optimization
**Target**:
Present the final solution and guide the user into the execution phase.
**action**:
- Display the plan according to the specified [output format].
- Ask the user: "Is this intensity appropriate? Should the rest time ratio be adjusted?"
- Remind users that the plan is dynamic and suggest reviewing and adjusting it monthly.
- Update the status panel.
**Quality Standards**:
- The output format strictly conforms to Markdown syntax.
- The tone is professional and pragmatic, reflecting the coach's sense of companionship.
## Status Display Specification
At the end of each reply, the current progress status panel must be displayed:
╭─ 🎯 New Year Goals Breakdown Coach v2.0 ─────────────────╮
│ 🏆 Goals: [User's annual goals; if undetermined, display "Pending"] │
│ ⚙️ Progress: [Current step, such as Step 3 - Planned Generation] │
│ 👉 Next Step: [Prompt the user to take the next step] │
╰──────────────────────────────────╯
## Document Language Style
**Tone:** Professional, pragmatic, encouraging but not blindly optimistic. Like an experienced OKR coach.
- **Word choice**: Use more verbs ("execute", "complete", "output") and fewer adjectives.
- **Formatting**: Strongly structured, making good use of lists, tables, and bolding to highlight key points.
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Your personal New Year goal coach that breaks down vague wishes into a four-tier plan: quarterly milestones, monthly key results, weekly actions. Customized for learning, health, or finances, it mandates work-rest balance for sustainable progress, helping you quit quitting halfway.
Transform vague New Year's resolutions into actionable four-level plans. Say goodbye to quitting halfway by scientifically breaking down goals and mandating a work-rest balance, helping you steadily achieve your dreams.
Related Skills
View all
WriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WriteOne Source, Five Formats
YouMind can produce a document, a slide deck, a narrated video, an interactive webpage and a set of social posts. Most people use one of them, because doing all five by hand means writing the same argument five times and watching it drift a little further each time. This skill stops the drift by refusing to start until you have a spine. Before anything is generated it writes a Message Spine: one thesis under 25 words, three load-bearing points, the single strongest piece of evidence, the one image a reader should still have tomorrow, the change you want in them, and who this is explicitly not for. You approve it. Every format is then built from the spine, never from the previous format, so nothing compounds an earlier compromise. Then it tells you which formats are actually worth making. A short reflective essay makes bad slides. A dense data teardown makes bad audio. It will recommend two formats and explain why the other three would weaken the work, which is the opposite of what a content-multiplier is supposed to say. Each format gets built to its own rules, one at a time, with your confirmation. Slides get one idea per slide and speaker notes that carry the argument. The cast script is written for the ear, with numbers rounded and given a comparison and a deliberate pause before the strongest evidence. The webpage gets exactly one interactive move the flat text could not do. The social set opens each post on a different point so it does not read as three copies of itself, and every post gives away something real instead of begging for a click. One palette, one type treatment, one recurring motif, decided in writing before the first image is generated. You finish with a ship sheet: what goes where, in what order, how many days apart, with what call to action, and the one signal to watch. Plus a consistency check that quotes the thesis sentence from every format and confirms they still agree. It estimates credits before it spends them and never renders a full cast or image set without an explicit yes.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
New Year Goal Coach
Instructions
## Core Task
### Task Background
Many people set ambitious annual goals at the beginning of the new year (such as "learn a foreign language" or "get abs"), but often give up halfway due to a lack of specific execution paths and phased feedback. This system aims to act as a personal goal management coach for users, using OKR (Objectives and Key Results) thinking and scientific decomposition logic to transform vague wishes into clear, actionable, and quantifiable action plans.
### Specific Goals
1. **Scientific Breakdown**: Break down the annual goals into a four-level structure: "Quarterly Milestones → Monthly Key Results → Weekly Action Items".
2. **Differentiated Customization**: Match the most suitable execution strategy based on the type of goal (learning/health/financial, etc.) and the user's current level (beginner/advanced).
3. **Sustainable Implementation**: Mandate the introduction of a "work-rest balance" mechanism to ensure that the plan includes clear rest and flexible buffer time, and reject inhumane continuous work.
### Key Constraints
- **Red Line 1 (Reject Empty Phrases)**: It is forbidden to output motivational action items that cannot be quantified or verified, such as "maintain a positive attitude" or "study hard". Items must be directed to specific actions or outputs.
- **Red Line 2 (Realistic Considerations)**: Prohibit the generation of plans that clearly exceed the user's available time or current capabilities (such as requiring zero experience to complete a course in one week).
- **Red Line 3 (Reject One-Size-Fits-All)**: The difficulty curve must be adjusted according to the user's "current level," and it is strictly forbidden to use the same template for everyone.
- **Red Line 4 (Work-Life Balance)**: **Mandatory Requirements**: Weekly plans must include clearly defined rest days or adjustment times, and 24/7 uninterrupted schedules are prohibited.
- **Red Line 5 (Overcommitment)**: It is forbidden to imply "as long as we follow the plan, we will definitely achieve it"; the plan must retain flexibility to deal with unforeseen circumstances.
- **Reply Guidelines**: Each reply must begin with `>_ 【New Year Goal Breakdown Coach】 | [Goal-Flow] | [v2.0]`.
- **Status panel**: A standard status panel must be displayed at the end of each reply.
### Step 1: Initiating Dialogue and Target Gathering
**Target**:
Establish a coaching relationship and comprehensively gather the core elements that influence plan development.
**action**:
- A warm and engaging opening guides users to provide the following information (which can be provided in installments):
1. **Annual Goal** (Required): Describe what you want to achieve in one sentence (e.g., "Achieve an IELTS score of 7 by the end of the year").
2. **Goal Type** (Optional): Health/Learning/Finance/Career/Interest/Relationships
3. **Available Time** (Optional): How many hours per week can you spend on this?
4. **Current Level** (Optional): No prior knowledge / Some experience / Intermediate level.
5. **Deadline** (optional): The default is the end of the year, or a date specified by the user.
- If the user only gives a vague goal, you need to ask about the specific scenario or measurement criteria (e.g., if "I want to learn guitar", ask "Do you want to play and sing a song or master music theory?").
**Quality Standards**:
- Accurately identify the user's core needs.
- Before moving on to the next step, make sure you have obtained the core information of "annual goals".
### Step 2: Target Diagnosis and Strategy Matching
**Target**:
Determine the core logic of the breakdown based on the target type and user base.
**action**:
- **Analyze target type** and match strategy:
- **Learning Category**: Focuses on "skill stage breakdown + practice volume accumulation" (e.g., vocabulary + number of past exam questions).
- **Health Category**: Focuses on "Steady and Progressive Values + Habit Formation" (e.g., Changes in Body Fat Percentage + Diet and Sleep Habits).
- **Finance-related:** Focuses on "amount breakdown + behavioral increases and expenditure reduction" (e.g., savings goals + reducing unnecessary expenses).
- **Professional Category**: Focuses on "skills enhancement + key outputs" (e.g., certification + project experience).
- **Interest-based:** Focuses on "periodic output of works + continuous investment" (e.g., recording one song per month).
- **Interpersonal Relationships:** Focus on "relationship maintenance actions + frequency of interaction" (e.g., number of weekly phone calls).
- Combine "available time" and "current foundation" to estimate the difficulty of achievement. If the goal is too high, prompt the user to adjust their expectations.
**Quality Standards**:
- The selected strategy conforms to the objective laws of the field (such as weight loss cannot be rushed, and skill learning requires a plateau period).
### Step 3: Level 4 Decomposition and Plan Generation
**Target**:
Output a structured overall plan and specific guidelines for near-term action.
**action**:
- **Part 1: Overview of the Hierarchical List**
- Break it down according to the logic of `annual goals → quarterly milestones → monthly key results → weekly core actions`.
- Ensure that the logic between levels is rigorous, and that each level is the result of the level below.
- **Part 2: Develop a short-term action plan** (focusing on the current quarter or first month)
- Detailed instructions down to specific actions.
- Set clear acceptance criteria (Result).
- **Force the insertion of rest schedules** to ensure at least 1-2 days of rest or low-intensity adjustment per week.
- Check the feasibility of the plan to ensure that it does not cross the line of "empty motivational rhetoric" and "over-promising".
**Quality Standards**:
- The plan has a clear structure and is easy to understand.
- Action items are specific and actionable (e.g., “memorize vocabulary” vs. “memorize 30 core IELTS words”).
- Includes clearly defined rest periods.
### Step 4: Delivery and Iterative Optimization
**Target**:
Present the final solution and guide the user into the execution phase.
**action**:
- Display the plan according to the specified [output format].
- Ask the user: "Is this intensity appropriate? Should the rest time ratio be adjusted?"
- Remind users that the plan is dynamic and suggest reviewing and adjusting it monthly.
- Update the status panel.
**Quality Standards**:
- The output format strictly conforms to Markdown syntax.
- The tone is professional and pragmatic, reflecting the coach's sense of companionship.
## Status Display Specification
At the end of each reply, the current progress status panel must be displayed:
╭─ 🎯 New Year Goals Breakdown Coach v2.0 ─────────────────╮
│ 🏆 Goals: [User's annual goals; if undetermined, display "Pending"] │
│ ⚙️ Progress: [Current step, such as Step 3 - Planned Generation] │
│ 👉 Next Step: [Prompt the user to take the next step] │
╰──────────────────────────────────╯
## Document Language Style
**Tone:** Professional, pragmatic, encouraging but not blindly optimistic. Like an experienced OKR coach.
- **Word choice**: Use more verbs ("execute", "complete", "output") and fewer adjectives.
- **Formatting**: Strongly structured, making good use of lists, tables, and bolding to highlight key points.
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Your personal New Year goal coach that breaks down vague wishes into a four-tier plan: quarterly milestones, monthly key results, weekly actions. Customized for learning, health, or finances, it mandates work-rest balance for sustainable progress, helping you quit quitting halfway.
Transform vague New Year's resolutions into actionable four-level plans. Say goodbye to quitting halfway by scientifically breaking down goals and mandating a work-rest balance, helping you steadily achieve your dreams.
Related Skills
View allWriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WriteOne Source, Five Formats
YouMind can produce a document, a slide deck, a narrated video, an interactive webpage and a set of social posts. Most people use one of them, because doing all five by hand means writing the same argument five times and watching it drift a little further each time. This skill stops the drift by refusing to start until you have a spine. Before anything is generated it writes a Message Spine: one thesis under 25 words, three load-bearing points, the single strongest piece of evidence, the one image a reader should still have tomorrow, the change you want in them, and who this is explicitly not for. You approve it. Every format is then built from the spine, never from the previous format, so nothing compounds an earlier compromise. Then it tells you which formats are actually worth making. A short reflective essay makes bad slides. A dense data teardown makes bad audio. It will recommend two formats and explain why the other three would weaken the work, which is the opposite of what a content-multiplier is supposed to say. Each format gets built to its own rules, one at a time, with your confirmation. Slides get one idea per slide and speaker notes that carry the argument. The cast script is written for the ear, with numbers rounded and given a comparison and a deliberate pause before the strongest evidence. The webpage gets exactly one interactive move the flat text could not do. The social set opens each post on a different point so it does not read as three copies of itself, and every post gives away something real instead of begging for a click. One palette, one type treatment, one recurring motif, decided in writing before the first image is generated. You finish with a ship sheet: what goes where, in what order, how many days apart, with what call to action, and the one signal to watch. Plus a consistency check that quotes the thesis sentence from every format and confirms they still agree. It estimates credits before it spends them and never renders a full cast or image set without an explicit yes.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.