Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v7.0
Native-language editor-in-chief level surgical refinement, three-track customized service leading directly to top journals.
Why we love this skill
This tool offers a "three-track polishing system" that can refine academic papers to the level of top journal publication with the expertise of a native-speaker editor, based on the target journal, model paper, or general standards, and provides detailed annotations.
Instructions
The author has set the instructions to private. Below is a brief overview.
description
Native-speaker editor-level paper polishing, three-track customized approach directly meeting top journal review standards. Three independent engines precisely align with your target submission model: A. Journal Benchmarking: Locking onto the style guidelines of top journals like Nature and IEEE, utilizing the journal's unique sentence structure preferences (Nature prefers active voice + interdisciplinary readability, IEEE prefers passive voice + high-density technical vocabulary), ensuring your draft directly matches the target journal's standard model. B. Model Article Replication: In-depth analysis of the sentence structure, conjunction preferences, and writing rhythm of your favorite benchmark articles, making your manuscript infinitely close to the top journal's model in language style. C. Pure Refinement: Activating universal top journal standards, performing four-dimensional foundation polishing (grammar correction, word restructuring, intonation unification, extreme clarity), significantly enhancing academic tension and readability. Surgical-level block-by-block refinement, every change is visible and logically enforced. Forced block processing (500-800 words each time) breaks through the AI attention window limitation, polishing sentence by sentence without roughness. Dual-core adversarial engine (Core A language restructuring + ... (Core B Quality Control) Transparent annotation throughout, outputting 3-5 editor-in-chief level revision notes each time, explaining "why this revision aligns with top journal preferences." Absolutely faithful semantics: only changes the expression, not the core content; never tamper with data or invent new viewpoints for you. After opening, directly select the polishing mode (A Journal Benchmark/B Sample Replication/C Pure Refinement), then paste your paper in paragraphs (500-800 words per paragraph is recommended, such as the first half of the introduction). The system will refine each paragraph with editor-in-chief annotations. After confirming there are no errors, proceed to the next paragraph. Fully interactive guidance, no complex configuration required. Technical Architecture: Based on the AFP (AI-First Product) design methodology, it adopts a phased decomposition + forced stop point + status dashboard mechanism to ensure that every step is controllable, auditable, and traceable. Supporting Tools: The official polishing module of the "Academic Paper Full-Process Writing System v3.1 (Wuyuan × AFP)" forms a complete closed loop. • Writing System (Wuyuan × AFP): From topic selection to first draft generation. • Polishing System (AFP): Refining the first draft to the standards for top journal submissions. Applicable Scenarios: Papers requested by reviewers to be "native-language polished," papers aiming for top journals like Nature/Science, and master's/doctoral students and young scholars who want to learn the writing style of top journals. Core Differences: Several times cheaper than hiring a polishing company, several times more accurate than AI to complete a one-time edit, and several times more efficient than blindly editing by oneself.
Related Skills
View all
Intelligent teaching feedback
"How do you transform criticism into feedback that students are willing to listen to, accept, and can actually use?" This is a question every mentor repeatedly asks themselves during late-night debriefings. Have you ever encountered this moment? You know where the problem lies, but you also know that once harsh words are uttered, students will be hesitant and timid for the rest of the day. Not saying anything is unacceptable, being too harsh is also problematic, and being too lenient might not be effective enough. "Intelligent Teaching Feedback" is designed for this dilemma. You only need to describe what happened in a sentence or two, and it will automatically: 🧠 Select the most suitable feedback model from six professional feedback models: COIN, SBI, Pendleton, NVC, Sandwich, and GROW 🎯 Generate a verbal response that you can directly articulate—conversational, warm, and specific to the event 🛡️ Ensure criticism is wrapped in a constructive framework, protecting students' self-esteem and stimulating self-motivation 🔄 Simultaneously provide alternative solutions, giving you choices and confidence. It doesn't speak for you; it helps you figure out how to say things that resonate with students. Clinical teaching, classroom theory, and skills training—automatically adapting to different feedback styles across various fields. Safety is never compromised, and novice students are never discouraged. From now on, every feedback is an empowerment, not a blow.
Content converted to illusionary text and images v1.0
Convert any text content into a first-person hallucination report with accompanying images. Supports four types of hallucinogens (see Bodhi seed/Mandala/high fever delirium/sleep deprivation 72h+), automatically analyzes content characteristics to recommend the most matching hallucinogen, re-encodes the original content according to the rules of real symptoms, and outputs stream-of-consciousness hallucination text with corresponding style images.
All-in-one writing assistant for research proposals
A full-process research proposal writing assistant—from topic selection and conception, literature review, research framework to final draft polishing, it is suitable for various types of research projects, including those funded by the National Social Science Fund of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Ministry of Education's Humanities and Social Sciences, and provincial and ministerial-level projects, supporting both one-step and step-by-step approaches.
Academic Paper Three-Track Polishing System v7.0
Native-language editor-in-chief level surgical refinement, three-track customized service leading directly to top journals.
Why we love this skill
This tool offers a "three-track polishing system" that can refine academic papers to the level of top journal publication with the expertise of a native-speaker editor, based on the target journal, model paper, or general standards, and provides detailed annotations.
Instructions
The author has set the instructions to private. Below is a brief overview.
description
Native-speaker editor-level paper polishing, three-track customized approach directly meeting top journal review standards. Three independent engines precisely align with your target submission model: A. Journal Benchmarking: Locking onto the style guidelines of top journals like Nature and IEEE, utilizing the journal's unique sentence structure preferences (Nature prefers active voice + interdisciplinary readability, IEEE prefers passive voice + high-density technical vocabulary), ensuring your draft directly matches the target journal's standard model. B. Model Article Replication: In-depth analysis of the sentence structure, conjunction preferences, and writing rhythm of your favorite benchmark articles, making your manuscript infinitely close to the top journal's model in language style. C. Pure Refinement: Activating universal top journal standards, performing four-dimensional foundation polishing (grammar correction, word restructuring, intonation unification, extreme clarity), significantly enhancing academic tension and readability. Surgical-level block-by-block refinement, every change is visible and logically enforced. Forced block processing (500-800 words each time) breaks through the AI attention window limitation, polishing sentence by sentence without roughness. Dual-core adversarial engine (Core A language restructuring + ... (Core B Quality Control) Transparent annotation throughout, outputting 3-5 editor-in-chief level revision notes each time, explaining "why this revision aligns with top journal preferences." Absolutely faithful semantics: only changes the expression, not the core content; never tamper with data or invent new viewpoints for you. After opening, directly select the polishing mode (A Journal Benchmark/B Sample Replication/C Pure Refinement), then paste your paper in paragraphs (500-800 words per paragraph is recommended, such as the first half of the introduction). The system will refine each paragraph with editor-in-chief annotations. After confirming there are no errors, proceed to the next paragraph. Fully interactive guidance, no complex configuration required. Technical Architecture: Based on the AFP (AI-First Product) design methodology, it adopts a phased decomposition + forced stop point + status dashboard mechanism to ensure that every step is controllable, auditable, and traceable. Supporting Tools: The official polishing module of the "Academic Paper Full-Process Writing System v3.1 (Wuyuan × AFP)" forms a complete closed loop. • Writing System (Wuyuan × AFP): From topic selection to first draft generation. • Polishing System (AFP): Refining the first draft to the standards for top journal submissions. Applicable Scenarios: Papers requested by reviewers to be "native-language polished," papers aiming for top journals like Nature/Science, and master's/doctoral students and young scholars who want to learn the writing style of top journals. Core Differences: Several times cheaper than hiring a polishing company, several times more accurate than AI to complete a one-time edit, and several times more efficient than blindly editing by oneself.
Related Skills
View allIntelligent teaching feedback
"How do you transform criticism into feedback that students are willing to listen to, accept, and can actually use?" This is a question every mentor repeatedly asks themselves during late-night debriefings. Have you ever encountered this moment? You know where the problem lies, but you also know that once harsh words are uttered, students will be hesitant and timid for the rest of the day. Not saying anything is unacceptable, being too harsh is also problematic, and being too lenient might not be effective enough. "Intelligent Teaching Feedback" is designed for this dilemma. You only need to describe what happened in a sentence or two, and it will automatically: 🧠 Select the most suitable feedback model from six professional feedback models: COIN, SBI, Pendleton, NVC, Sandwich, and GROW 🎯 Generate a verbal response that you can directly articulate—conversational, warm, and specific to the event 🛡️ Ensure criticism is wrapped in a constructive framework, protecting students' self-esteem and stimulating self-motivation 🔄 Simultaneously provide alternative solutions, giving you choices and confidence. It doesn't speak for you; it helps you figure out how to say things that resonate with students. Clinical teaching, classroom theory, and skills training—automatically adapting to different feedback styles across various fields. Safety is never compromised, and novice students are never discouraged. From now on, every feedback is an empowerment, not a blow.
Content converted to illusionary text and images v1.0
Convert any text content into a first-person hallucination report with accompanying images. Supports four types of hallucinogens (see Bodhi seed/Mandala/high fever delirium/sleep deprivation 72h+), automatically analyzes content characteristics to recommend the most matching hallucinogen, re-encodes the original content according to the rules of real symptoms, and outputs stream-of-consciousness hallucination text with corresponding style images.
All-in-one writing assistant for research proposals
A full-process research proposal writing assistant—from topic selection and conception, literature review, research framework to final draft polishing, it is suitable for various types of research projects, including those funded by the National Social Science Fund of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Ministry of Education's Humanities and Social Sciences, and provincial and ministerial-level projects, supporting both one-step and step-by-step approaches.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.