description

Literature reviews are an unavoidable hurdle for graduate students—but organizing the information from 50 papers into a "logical review" rather than a "chronicle of papers" relies on methodology, not brute force. Tell it your research direction and the core papers you've already read; it first helps you build a framework—a field map, a breakdown of sub-topics, controversies and gaps—and then, after you confirm this, it helps you organize the language chapter by chapter. It doesn't help you write a paper; it helps you express the academic logic of the papers you've already read. ✨ Core Competencies 1. Literature Review Framework Generation: Introduction → Domain Map → Sub-topics → Controversies and Gaps → Outlook, Standard Academic Structure 2. Domain Map: Uses timelines/schools of thought to organize the development of the field, marking milestone papers 3. In-depth Sub-topic Analysis: Introduces each paper + compares within the group + overall contributions and shortcomings 4. Controversy and Gaps Analysis: At least 3 points of controversy + 3 research gaps, with specific literature sources 5. Academic Writing Standards: Citation format, English-Chinese terminology comparison, critical language rather than rambling 📱 Applicable Scenarios - Literature review section of graduate thesis/proposal - Related Work section of journal articles - Quick literature review + structured notes when entering a new field - Used in conjunction with "Paper Quick Reading Notes" and "Dual-Mode Paper Study" to form a "Read → Analyze → Synthesize" literature workflow ⚠️ Note: This skill does not perform real-time academic search. You need to provide information about the papers you have read (title/author/core viewpoints), and it will help you organize and write.