Deep Critical Analysis
Analyze ideas with rigorous frameworks
Description
Deliver high-quality critical analysis of any viewpoint: strengthen both sides of the argument through steelmanning, distinguish facts from value judgments, balance inductive and deductive reasoning, and reconstruct ideas from first principles. Conclude with a careful assessment that includes confidence levels, conditions of applicability, and questions that still need to be verified. Supports short viewpoints as well as long-form text or file input, with online search available to strengthen the factual basis.
Related Skills
View all
Argument Rigor Upgrade V2
A professional argument review assistant based on the critical thinking principles in *Asking the Right Questions*. It applies a fixed 10-step questioning process to any viewpoint, article, copy, or speech, identifying logical fallacies, evidence gaps, data issues, missing information, and causal errors. It outputs a comprehensive argument map, a complete list of weaknesses, and constructive optimization or rewriting suggestions.
Fact Check
Hand any opinion, conclusion, data point, or proposal to an AI fact-checker: online source tracing, five-level credibility ratings, and reasoning-chain analysis—followed by a fact-check report you can share directly. 【What it does】Paste any claim, and the skill completes three checks automatically: 🔍 Break it down—separates the claim into “verifiable facts / inferred conclusions / value judgments,” keeping positions distinct from facts 🌐 Trace sources online—verifies sources, samples, statistical definitions, dates, and full context point by point, with cross-checking across multiple channels 🧩 Check the reasoning chain—identifies hidden assumptions, correlation-versus-causation errors, omitted alternative explanations, and the conditions under which the conclusion holds or fails 【Why choose it】 ✅ Five-level credibility ratings: Confirmed / Generally sound but should be narrowed / Contested / Insufficient evidence / Clearly false, with source links for every item ✅ Four-part report: Reliable facts and corrections / The most critical flaws in the reasoning chain / The strongest revised version / How much you can trust it ✅ No made-up answers: When a claim cannot be verified, it is honestly marked “Insufficient evidence” instead of being passed off as “possibly true” ✅ Report-ready output: Share it directly with readers, clients, or your community 【Who it’s for】Independent media and content creators, investors and analysts, students and researchers, and anyone who needs to quickly decide whether a statement can be trusted. 【How to use it】Paste the claim you want checked—anything from one sentence to a paragraph. For example, enter “People with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis often have low energy” to get a source-backed, tiered fact-check report. ⚠️ For medical, legal, investment, and other professional questions, use this for information verification only and rely on qualified professionals for advice.
ResearchArguScope: Argument Insight
ArguScope is a professional argument analysis tool designed to help users deeply understand the argument quality of any text or audio/video content (requires a transcript), and determine whether the strength of its conclusions matches the evidence provided. This tool is suitable for content creators, researchers, commentators, and any user looking to improve critical thinking and argument analysis skills. It can identify the core claims, supporting evidence, implicit assumptions, and reasoning processes in a text, and evaluate the strength of the conclusions. Users can thus understand the strengths and weaknesses of arguments, enhancing their ability to discern the truthfulness of information and the validity of arguments. ArguScope's core features include extracting the argument skeleton, analyzing the text type, reasoning method, and evidence level; identifying five key logical issues: evidence gaps, causal gaps, conceptual gaps, generalization gaps, and value gaps; and performing fact-checking as needed. Finally, it provides a detailed argument analysis report, including an overall score, argument strength assessment, key issue analysis, and a fact-check checklist, to help users comprehensively evaluate the argument quality of the content.
Deep Critical Analysis
Analyze ideas with rigorous frameworks
Description
Deliver high-quality critical analysis of any viewpoint: strengthen both sides of the argument through steelmanning, distinguish facts from value judgments, balance inductive and deductive reasoning, and reconstruct ideas from first principles. Conclude with a careful assessment that includes confidence levels, conditions of applicability, and questions that still need to be verified. Supports short viewpoints as well as long-form text or file input, with online search available to strengthen the factual basis.
Related Skills
View allArgument Rigor Upgrade V2
A professional argument review assistant based on the critical thinking principles in *Asking the Right Questions*. It applies a fixed 10-step questioning process to any viewpoint, article, copy, or speech, identifying logical fallacies, evidence gaps, data issues, missing information, and causal errors. It outputs a comprehensive argument map, a complete list of weaknesses, and constructive optimization or rewriting suggestions.
Fact Check
Hand any opinion, conclusion, data point, or proposal to an AI fact-checker: online source tracing, five-level credibility ratings, and reasoning-chain analysis—followed by a fact-check report you can share directly. 【What it does】Paste any claim, and the skill completes three checks automatically: 🔍 Break it down—separates the claim into “verifiable facts / inferred conclusions / value judgments,” keeping positions distinct from facts 🌐 Trace sources online—verifies sources, samples, statistical definitions, dates, and full context point by point, with cross-checking across multiple channels 🧩 Check the reasoning chain—identifies hidden assumptions, correlation-versus-causation errors, omitted alternative explanations, and the conditions under which the conclusion holds or fails 【Why choose it】 ✅ Five-level credibility ratings: Confirmed / Generally sound but should be narrowed / Contested / Insufficient evidence / Clearly false, with source links for every item ✅ Four-part report: Reliable facts and corrections / The most critical flaws in the reasoning chain / The strongest revised version / How much you can trust it ✅ No made-up answers: When a claim cannot be verified, it is honestly marked “Insufficient evidence” instead of being passed off as “possibly true” ✅ Report-ready output: Share it directly with readers, clients, or your community 【Who it’s for】Independent media and content creators, investors and analysts, students and researchers, and anyone who needs to quickly decide whether a statement can be trusted. 【How to use it】Paste the claim you want checked—anything from one sentence to a paragraph. For example, enter “People with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis often have low energy” to get a source-backed, tiered fact-check report. ⚠️ For medical, legal, investment, and other professional questions, use this for information verification only and rely on qualified professionals for advice.
ResearchArguScope: Argument Insight
ArguScope is a professional argument analysis tool designed to help users deeply understand the argument quality of any text or audio/video content (requires a transcript), and determine whether the strength of its conclusions matches the evidence provided. This tool is suitable for content creators, researchers, commentators, and any user looking to improve critical thinking and argument analysis skills. It can identify the core claims, supporting evidence, implicit assumptions, and reasoning processes in a text, and evaluate the strength of the conclusions. Users can thus understand the strengths and weaknesses of arguments, enhancing their ability to discern the truthfulness of information and the validity of arguments. ArguScope's core features include extracting the argument skeleton, analyzing the text type, reasoning method, and evidence level; identifying five key logical issues: evidence gaps, causal gaps, conceptual gaps, generalization gaps, and value gaps; and performing fact-checking as needed. Finally, it provides a detailed argument analysis report, including an overall score, argument strength assessment, key issue analysis, and a fact-check checklist, to help users comprehensively evaluate the argument quality of the content.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.