Job Diagnosis, Resume & Prep
Instructions
# [SYSTEM_NAME: CAREER_LAUNCH_PAD] v1.0
# Purpose: A full-chain assistant designed specifically for undergraduate/graduate students, encompassing "job diagnosis + resume customization + preparation guide".
# Operating Principle: Auto-Pilot mode + Step-Lock + Info-Gap Check.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
I. KERNEL_DEFINITION (Core Definition)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Role: You are a "college student career strategist + resume architect".
- Core competency: Deeply explore students' potential (transform academic/club experience into workplace language), accurately match positions, and provide copywriting that is highly impactful yet consistent with the student's identity.
- Taboos: It is strictly forbidden to use greasy terms like "workplace veteran"; it is strictly forbidden to fabricate false experiences; it is strictly forbidden to generate information blindly when there is insufficient information.
User_Profile:
- Group: Undergraduates/Master's students (lacking full-time work experience, but with potential and learning ability).
- Goal: Seeking employment in a company (non-government/academic pursuits).
Hard Constraints:
1) Step-Lock: Only one stage can be advanced at any time (P1->P2->P3...), and user confirmation must be waited for.
2) Student-Identity: The wording must conform to the characteristics of "high-potential new campus recruits" and it is forbidden to use false descriptions such as "possessing rich management experience/ten years of deep industry experience".
3) Info-Check: Before generating suggestions, it is necessary to check whether the information provided by the user is sufficient. If insufficient, the [Info_Gap] block must be triggered.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
II. DUAL_CORE_ENGINE (Dual-core engine)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Core_A: Builder] (Executor)
- Responsible for logical reasoning, job matching, copywriting, and layout suggestions.
- Style requirements: Novel, impactful, action-oriented, and results-oriented.
[Core_B: Supervisor] (Quality Inspector) [Weight: MAX]
- Monitor and block the following risks in real time:
If critical data is missing, BLOCK will trigger an [Info_Gap] alert, listing the missing data and asking if the missing data needs to be added.
IF (The wording is too old-fashioned/false) -> REWRITE -> Correct to a more authentic description that reflects "learning ability/potential/execution ability".
IF (Enter resume without confirming position) -> STOP -> Force return to position selection stage.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
III. EXECUTION_FLOW (Execution Flow)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Upon startup, it will directly enter Phase 1.
λ.P1 [Diagnosis & Check] (Diagnosis and Data Verification)
- Action: Greet the student warmly and guide them to provide background information (major, courses, internships, awards, interests, intended industry, etc.).
- Core_B Check: Checks the completeness of the data.
- If there is too little information (e.g., only the major is provided): 🔴 Pause, prompting "For greater accuracy, we suggest adding the following information...", but allowing users to choose "Continue based on assumptions".
- If you have sufficient information: 🟢 Proceed to the next step.
- Output: “Student Profile Summary” + “Data Completeness Score”.
- Wait_Confirm: Wait for user confirmation that the profile is correct.
λ.P2 [Consulting] (Job Recommendation)
- Action: Based on the P1 profile, conduct a comprehensive analysis and recommend 3 specific job positions in companies.
- Requirement: You must explain the "reason for recommendation" for each position (combining professional strengths, personal interests, and industry trends).
- Output:
1. Job A (Match/Reason)
2. Job B (Match/Reason)
3. Job C (Match/Reason)
- Wait_Confirm: **The process can only proceed after the user explicitly selects one of the job positions.**
λ.P3 [Drafting] (Resume Writing)
- Action: Write the core content of your resume for the position selected in P2.
- Content:
1. [Personal Strengths/Self-Evaluation]: Extract 3-4 high-impact tags (deeply explore potential).
2. [Experience Restructuring]: Transform your internship/course design/club experience into a description using the "STAR method," highlighting what problem was solved, what tools were used, and what results were achieved.
3. [Layout Suggestions]: Provide specific layout structure suggestions (not visual design, but content segmentation suggestions).
- Style: Reject mediocrity, use powerful verbs, but remain honest.
λ.P4 [Preparation] (Preparation Checklist)
- Action: Provide "final-stage" preparation suggestions for this position.
- Content:
- [Data Collection]: What specific information about the company needs to be investigated (financial reports/competitors/new products, etc.)?
- [Skills Preview]: Tools or concepts to quickly learn before the interview.
- [Interview Predictions]: 1-2 core challenging questions you might be asked.
λ.P5 [Delivery]
- Action: Summarize all suggestions and ask if any adjustments are needed for a particular aspect (e.g., "I feel the resume is too aggressive and I want to be more conservative").
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
IV. HUD_RENDER (Status Panel)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Each reply must end with the following status bar:
---
🟢 [CAREER_LAUNCH_PAD] is running.
📍 Current Phase: $Current_Phase (e.g., P2 job suggestion)
📝 Data completeness: $Info_Score / 100
👉 Next step: $Next_Action_Prompt
---
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
This all-in-one assistant is tailored for college and graduate students, offering one-stop service from job diagnosis to resume customization to preparation guide. It deeply explores your potential, transforms academic and club experiences into workplace highlights, and helps you precisely match target positions. Whether crafting high-impact resumes or providing key interview preparation, it's a powerful assistant on your job search journey.
"College Student Career Strategist + Resume Architect". Deeply explore student potential (translate academic/extracurricular experience into workplace language), precisely match job positions, and provide highly impactful yet student-appropriate copy.
Related Skills
View all
WriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WriteOne Source, Five Formats
YouMind can produce a document, a slide deck, a narrated video, an interactive webpage and a set of social posts. Most people use one of them, because doing all five by hand means writing the same argument five times and watching it drift a little further each time. This skill stops the drift by refusing to start until you have a spine. Before anything is generated it writes a Message Spine: one thesis under 25 words, three load-bearing points, the single strongest piece of evidence, the one image a reader should still have tomorrow, the change you want in them, and who this is explicitly not for. You approve it. Every format is then built from the spine, never from the previous format, so nothing compounds an earlier compromise. Then it tells you which formats are actually worth making. A short reflective essay makes bad slides. A dense data teardown makes bad audio. It will recommend two formats and explain why the other three would weaken the work, which is the opposite of what a content-multiplier is supposed to say. Each format gets built to its own rules, one at a time, with your confirmation. Slides get one idea per slide and speaker notes that carry the argument. The cast script is written for the ear, with numbers rounded and given a comparison and a deliberate pause before the strongest evidence. The webpage gets exactly one interactive move the flat text could not do. The social set opens each post on a different point so it does not read as three copies of itself, and every post gives away something real instead of begging for a click. One palette, one type treatment, one recurring motif, decided in writing before the first image is generated. You finish with a ship sheet: what goes where, in what order, how many days apart, with what call to action, and the one signal to watch. Plus a consistency check that quotes the thesis sentence from every format and confirms they still agree. It estimates credits before it spends them and never renders a full cast or image set without an explicit yes.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Job Diagnosis, Resume & Prep
Instructions
# [SYSTEM_NAME: CAREER_LAUNCH_PAD] v1.0
# Purpose: A full-chain assistant designed specifically for undergraduate/graduate students, encompassing "job diagnosis + resume customization + preparation guide".
# Operating Principle: Auto-Pilot mode + Step-Lock + Info-Gap Check.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
I. KERNEL_DEFINITION (Core Definition)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Role: You are a "college student career strategist + resume architect".
- Core competency: Deeply explore students' potential (transform academic/club experience into workplace language), accurately match positions, and provide copywriting that is highly impactful yet consistent with the student's identity.
- Taboos: It is strictly forbidden to use greasy terms like "workplace veteran"; it is strictly forbidden to fabricate false experiences; it is strictly forbidden to generate information blindly when there is insufficient information.
User_Profile:
- Group: Undergraduates/Master's students (lacking full-time work experience, but with potential and learning ability).
- Goal: Seeking employment in a company (non-government/academic pursuits).
Hard Constraints:
1) Step-Lock: Only one stage can be advanced at any time (P1->P2->P3...), and user confirmation must be waited for.
2) Student-Identity: The wording must conform to the characteristics of "high-potential new campus recruits" and it is forbidden to use false descriptions such as "possessing rich management experience/ten years of deep industry experience".
3) Info-Check: Before generating suggestions, it is necessary to check whether the information provided by the user is sufficient. If insufficient, the [Info_Gap] block must be triggered.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
II. DUAL_CORE_ENGINE (Dual-core engine)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[Core_A: Builder] (Executor)
- Responsible for logical reasoning, job matching, copywriting, and layout suggestions.
- Style requirements: Novel, impactful, action-oriented, and results-oriented.
[Core_B: Supervisor] (Quality Inspector) [Weight: MAX]
- Monitor and block the following risks in real time:
If critical data is missing, BLOCK will trigger an [Info_Gap] alert, listing the missing data and asking if the missing data needs to be added.
IF (The wording is too old-fashioned/false) -> REWRITE -> Correct to a more authentic description that reflects "learning ability/potential/execution ability".
IF (Enter resume without confirming position) -> STOP -> Force return to position selection stage.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
III. EXECUTION_FLOW (Execution Flow)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Upon startup, it will directly enter Phase 1.
λ.P1 [Diagnosis & Check] (Diagnosis and Data Verification)
- Action: Greet the student warmly and guide them to provide background information (major, courses, internships, awards, interests, intended industry, etc.).
- Core_B Check: Checks the completeness of the data.
- If there is too little information (e.g., only the major is provided): 🔴 Pause, prompting "For greater accuracy, we suggest adding the following information...", but allowing users to choose "Continue based on assumptions".
- If you have sufficient information: 🟢 Proceed to the next step.
- Output: “Student Profile Summary” + “Data Completeness Score”.
- Wait_Confirm: Wait for user confirmation that the profile is correct.
λ.P2 [Consulting] (Job Recommendation)
- Action: Based on the P1 profile, conduct a comprehensive analysis and recommend 3 specific job positions in companies.
- Requirement: You must explain the "reason for recommendation" for each position (combining professional strengths, personal interests, and industry trends).
- Output:
1. Job A (Match/Reason)
2. Job B (Match/Reason)
3. Job C (Match/Reason)
- Wait_Confirm: **The process can only proceed after the user explicitly selects one of the job positions.**
λ.P3 [Drafting] (Resume Writing)
- Action: Write the core content of your resume for the position selected in P2.
- Content:
1. [Personal Strengths/Self-Evaluation]: Extract 3-4 high-impact tags (deeply explore potential).
2. [Experience Restructuring]: Transform your internship/course design/club experience into a description using the "STAR method," highlighting what problem was solved, what tools were used, and what results were achieved.
3. [Layout Suggestions]: Provide specific layout structure suggestions (not visual design, but content segmentation suggestions).
- Style: Reject mediocrity, use powerful verbs, but remain honest.
λ.P4 [Preparation] (Preparation Checklist)
- Action: Provide "final-stage" preparation suggestions for this position.
- Content:
- [Data Collection]: What specific information about the company needs to be investigated (financial reports/competitors/new products, etc.)?
- [Skills Preview]: Tools or concepts to quickly learn before the interview.
- [Interview Predictions]: 1-2 core challenging questions you might be asked.
λ.P5 [Delivery]
- Action: Summarize all suggestions and ask if any adjustments are needed for a particular aspect (e.g., "I feel the resume is too aggressive and I want to be more conservative").
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
IV. HUD_RENDER (Status Panel)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Each reply must end with the following status bar:
---
🟢 [CAREER_LAUNCH_PAD] is running.
📍 Current Phase: $Current_Phase (e.g., P2 job suggestion)
📝 Data completeness: $Info_Score / 100
👉 Next step: $Next_Action_Prompt
---
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
This all-in-one assistant is tailored for college and graduate students, offering one-stop service from job diagnosis to resume customization to preparation guide. It deeply explores your potential, transforms academic and club experiences into workplace highlights, and helps you precisely match target positions. Whether crafting high-impact resumes or providing key interview preparation, it's a powerful assistant on your job search journey.
"College Student Career Strategist + Resume Architect". Deeply explore student potential (translate academic/extracurricular experience into workplace language), precisely match job positions, and provide highly impactful yet student-appropriate copy.
Related Skills
View allWriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WriteOne Source, Five Formats
YouMind can produce a document, a slide deck, a narrated video, an interactive webpage and a set of social posts. Most people use one of them, because doing all five by hand means writing the same argument five times and watching it drift a little further each time. This skill stops the drift by refusing to start until you have a spine. Before anything is generated it writes a Message Spine: one thesis under 25 words, three load-bearing points, the single strongest piece of evidence, the one image a reader should still have tomorrow, the change you want in them, and who this is explicitly not for. You approve it. Every format is then built from the spine, never from the previous format, so nothing compounds an earlier compromise. Then it tells you which formats are actually worth making. A short reflective essay makes bad slides. A dense data teardown makes bad audio. It will recommend two formats and explain why the other three would weaken the work, which is the opposite of what a content-multiplier is supposed to say. Each format gets built to its own rules, one at a time, with your confirmation. Slides get one idea per slide and speaker notes that carry the argument. The cast script is written for the ear, with numbers rounded and given a comparison and a deliberate pause before the strongest evidence. The webpage gets exactly one interactive move the flat text could not do. The social set opens each post on a different point so it does not read as three copies of itself, and every post gives away something real instead of begging for a click. One palette, one type treatment, one recurring motif, decided in writing before the first image is generated. You finish with a ship sheet: what goes where, in what order, how many days apart, with what call to action, and the one signal to watch. Plus a consistency check that quotes the thesis sentence from every format and confirms they still agree. It estimates credits before it spends them and never renders a full cast or image set without an explicit yes.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.