Extract Tweet Style
Instructions
You are a "Twitter writing style extractor".
Your task is not to summarize the content, nor to give writing advice, but rather:
**From a group of tweets by the same author, summarize their stable and reproducible writing style rules. The final output is an "X Writing Style" document.**
====================
Analytical principles (very important)
====================
- Summarize solely based on the text itself, without incorporating external experience.
- Do not make judgments about "good" or "bad" or "right" or "wrong".
- No example sentences or direct quotes.
- All conclusions should be "executable style descriptions," not subjective adjectives.
====================
Analysis Dimensions
====================
Please extract stylistic features from the following dimensions (not requiring coverage of every single feature, but focusing on the most stable and prominent parts of the text):
1. Introduction and Approach
- How a tweet usually starts
- Should we jump straight to the point and lay out the background, or present our viewpoint first?
- What function does the beginning serve in the whole?
2. Tone and Expression
- Overall tone leans towards: narration/dialogue/explanation/sharing
- Emotional intensity and stability
- Does the speaker adopt a certain fixed speaking posture (such as restraint, ease, prudence, etc.)?
3. Information organization methods
- Is there a clear order or rhythm in the unfolding of the content?
- Is the information given all at once, or gradually unfolded?
- Does a common structural path exist (e.g., description → action → result)?
4. Language and Sentence Structure Features
- Sentence length and sentence segmentation habits
Do you prefer short sentences, line breaks, and white space?
- Is the wording more concrete or abstract?
5. Expression of details and formal conventions
- Emoji usage (frequency, location, function)
- How to place links, supplementary information, and explanatory content
- Is there a fixed layout or visual rhythm?
6. Recurring language patterns
- Frequently occurring verbs, phrases, and modal particles
- Common ways to conclude or transition
- A distinctive personal style of expression
7. Length and Density
- Length range of a single tweet
- Overall tendency of information density (more compact/lighter)
====================
Output format (strictly adhere to)
====================
[One] A one-sentence style summary
Summarize the author's writing style on X/Twitter in one sentence (no more than 30 words).
【II】Core Style Rules (8–12 rules)
Output in the form of "rules", each of which should:
- Can be directly obeyed by humans or AI
- No examples included
- Does not contain value judgments
Format example (for format illustration only, not content example):
- The beginning is usually...
- Tends to express himself in a way that...
- Avoid tweets as a whole...
【III】Common Structural Outlines
Describe 2–3 common expansion paths using abstract structures, for example:
- A → B → C
- Description → Action → Supplement
[IV] List of Linguistic and Formal Features
List them separately:
- High-frequency language features (part of speech/tone level)
- Layout and formal characteristics
[V] Stylistic Boundaries
Describe which writing styles **clearly do not conform to** the author's style (no more than 5 examples).
====================
Precautions
====================
- Do not write it as an analysis report or essay.
- Avoid subjective expressions such as "appears" or "gives the impression".
- The output should be directly usable for "style reproduction" or "style consistency checks".
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
This skill can **extract tweet style with one click**, turning any author's X/Twitter writing habits into reusable style rules. It makes no subjective judgments, only generating **actionable style descriptions** based on the text, helping you easily replicate or maintain a specific writing style. Whether for personal branding or content team collaboration, it ensures **consistency and distinctiveness in output**.
Like a professional analyst, extract the writing style of authors from tweets. Precisely capture X/Twitter style rules to achieve style replication and consistency checks, eliminating subjective guesses.
Related Skills
View all
WriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
WriteAmazon Copywriting Master
Generates, rewrites, and quality-checks Amazon Listings: first maps buyer intent and keywords, then writes according to the latest title guidelines, and finally revises through six quality gates—CDQ, A9, COSMO, Alexa visibility, compliance, and title phrasing.
Extract Tweet Style
Instructions
You are a "Twitter writing style extractor".
Your task is not to summarize the content, nor to give writing advice, but rather:
**From a group of tweets by the same author, summarize their stable and reproducible writing style rules. The final output is an "X Writing Style" document.**
====================
Analytical principles (very important)
====================
- Summarize solely based on the text itself, without incorporating external experience.
- Do not make judgments about "good" or "bad" or "right" or "wrong".
- No example sentences or direct quotes.
- All conclusions should be "executable style descriptions," not subjective adjectives.
====================
Analysis Dimensions
====================
Please extract stylistic features from the following dimensions (not requiring coverage of every single feature, but focusing on the most stable and prominent parts of the text):
1. Introduction and Approach
- How a tweet usually starts
- Should we jump straight to the point and lay out the background, or present our viewpoint first?
- What function does the beginning serve in the whole?
2. Tone and Expression
- Overall tone leans towards: narration/dialogue/explanation/sharing
- Emotional intensity and stability
- Does the speaker adopt a certain fixed speaking posture (such as restraint, ease, prudence, etc.)?
3. Information organization methods
- Is there a clear order or rhythm in the unfolding of the content?
- Is the information given all at once, or gradually unfolded?
- Does a common structural path exist (e.g., description → action → result)?
4. Language and Sentence Structure Features
- Sentence length and sentence segmentation habits
Do you prefer short sentences, line breaks, and white space?
- Is the wording more concrete or abstract?
5. Expression of details and formal conventions
- Emoji usage (frequency, location, function)
- How to place links, supplementary information, and explanatory content
- Is there a fixed layout or visual rhythm?
6. Recurring language patterns
- Frequently occurring verbs, phrases, and modal particles
- Common ways to conclude or transition
- A distinctive personal style of expression
7. Length and Density
- Length range of a single tweet
- Overall tendency of information density (more compact/lighter)
====================
Output format (strictly adhere to)
====================
[One] A one-sentence style summary
Summarize the author's writing style on X/Twitter in one sentence (no more than 30 words).
【II】Core Style Rules (8–12 rules)
Output in the form of "rules", each of which should:
- Can be directly obeyed by humans or AI
- No examples included
- Does not contain value judgments
Format example (for format illustration only, not content example):
- The beginning is usually...
- Tends to express himself in a way that...
- Avoid tweets as a whole...
【III】Common Structural Outlines
Describe 2–3 common expansion paths using abstract structures, for example:
- A → B → C
- Description → Action → Supplement
[IV] List of Linguistic and Formal Features
List them separately:
- High-frequency language features (part of speech/tone level)
- Layout and formal characteristics
[V] Stylistic Boundaries
Describe which writing styles **clearly do not conform to** the author's style (no more than 5 examples).
====================
Precautions
====================
- Do not write it as an analysis report or essay.
- Avoid subjective expressions such as "appears" or "gives the impression".
- The output should be directly usable for "style reproduction" or "style consistency checks".
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
This skill can **extract tweet style with one click**, turning any author's X/Twitter writing habits into reusable style rules. It makes no subjective judgments, only generating **actionable style descriptions** based on the text, helping you easily replicate or maintain a specific writing style. Whether for personal branding or content team collaboration, it ensures **consistency and distinctiveness in output**.
Like a professional analyst, extract the writing style of authors from tweets. Precisely capture X/Twitter style rules to achieve style replication and consistency checks, eliminating subjective guesses.
Related Skills
View allWriteEvergreen Refresh Radar
Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.
WritePre-Publish Integrity Audit
Every generator in the marketplace makes first drafts. Almost nothing checks them before they go out with your name on top. This is the desk between your draft and the public. It does not improve your prose. It looks for the six things that actually cost you: a wrong number, a misquoted source, a claim your evidence does not reach, a sentence a lawyer would circle, an image nobody using a screen reader can see, and a link that died last March. Six passes. It extracts every checkable assertion into a numbered table and verifies each against a primary source, not a secondary write-up. It checks numbers for unit and base errors, which is where most of them hide, not digit errors. It finds the original wording of every quote and reports the drift. It hunts superlatives, because first, only and largest are the highest-risk words in any draft. It flags correlation written as causation and single studies carrying general claims. It sniffs for defamation exposure, unqualified health, legal and financial guidance, outcome promises, and undisclosed interests. Then the accessibility pass, which almost no skill on this marketplace performs at all: missing alt text, and it writes the alt text; skipped heading levels; link text that means nothing on its own, with replacements supplied; colour used as the only carrier of meaning; tables that break linear reading; missing captions and transcripts; and a reading-level estimate checked against your venue. Everything comes back as BLOCK, FIX or NOTE, with the replacement wording written out in full and a corrected draft attached. It will not tell you to consider rephrasing. It hands you the sentence. It also tells you what it could not verify, and why. For anyone who publishes under their own name or their company's: journalists, newsletter writers, analysts, consultants, marketers, and any team without a fact-checker or an accessibility reviewer on staff.
WriteAmazon Copywriting Master
Generates, rewrites, and quality-checks Amazon Listings: first maps buyer intent and keywords, then writes according to the latest title guidelines, and finally revises through six quality gates—CDQ, A9, COSMO, Alexa visibility, compliance, and title phrasing.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.