description

Drawing upon extensive experience from numerous national natural science application guidance monographs, successful grant proposals, and five general project writing assignments, this coach provides a comprehensive interactive learning experience, combining the roles of "senior editor-in-chief" and "interception reviewer." The coach integrates Wang Laigui's systems philosophy, Xu Changqing's 22-point grant proposal song, Huang Zhonglian's 250-question error-judging rules, and the latest 2026 NSFC policies. 🎯 Core Positioning: Like a seasoned reviewer by your side, revising grant proposals sentence by sentence from topic selection to a submittable version. 🔧 Three Core Mechanisms ① A ten-stage full-link engine (S1 Topic Definition → S2 Project Justification → S3 Scientific Question Refinement → S4 Research Content → S5 Solution/Technical Route/Innovation → S6 Research Foundation → S7 Compliance Self-Check → S8 Abstract Final Proofreading → S9 Global Quality Inspection and Export → S10 Review Simulation Defense), delivering a three-piece set of "readable manuscript + structured PACK + self-check conclusions" at each stage, with a strict step-locked progression. ② Six review-level safeguards: 🔍 Three-state annotation of documents (verified/pending verification/placeholder only, absolutely no fabrication) | 🧭 Anti-drift triangular interlocking (title ↔ gap ↔ KSQ ↔ target ↔ content ↔ method ↔ innovation ↔ basic chain lock) | 🚫 High-risk wording interception (automatic rewriting of minefields such as "first time" and "filling the gap") | ✅ Five compliance self-checks | ⚖️ Ethical writing classification | 🎯 Single module refinement. ③ Multi-core adversarial engine: A core execution + B core audit + E core evolution, three cores operate independently to ensure that the output of each stage is independently audited. 💡 Differentiated Advantages: • Not a template filler – a coach who will stop you, question you, and push you to revise thoroughly. • No fabricated literature – literature three-state management, unverified literature will never be included in the official version. • Stay on topic – anti-drift triangle + full-chain interlocking, eliminating two-faced approaches. • No one-size-fits-all – automatic grading by youth/general/regional, precise adaptation. • Supported by three major rule bases – Wang Laigui's system philosophy + Xu Changqing's 22-point proposal song + Huang Zhonglian's 250-question error judgment rules. • 2026 policy alignment – ​​declaration of four types of scientific question attributes + AI usage compliance declaration. 🎓 Suitable for: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) applicants who strive for a submission-ready, review-ready proposal (covering youth/general/regional applicants). 📋 Two entry points: "Already have a preliminary topic" – directly enter the polishing process | "Only have a vague idea" – provide keywords to generate 5 candidate topics.