End-First Humanities Proposals

End-First Humanities Proposals

Work backward from reviewers to design

Made by
LLily
Installed by
0
CategoryWrite
FromYouMind

Description

Editor's Recommendation

Recommended by

淡苍

Why we love this skill

Works backward from reviewer judgment to shape the topic, innovation, research design, and proposal. Literature, innovation, and human-confirmation gates curb vague ideas and rework while evidence and cross-checks protect credibility.

The biggest risk in a proposal isn’t writing slowly—it’s heading in the wrong direction. Most methods have you “write from start to finish, following the research process.” This Skill takes the opposite approach—backward first, then forward: it pushes you to clarify “what exactly is the innovation,” then work backward from the reviewers’ perspective to determine “what needs to be shown and why they should believe you.” Only after that does it have you write in a logical reading order. It sets three hard gates: you can’t lock in a topic until you’ve searched the literature thoroughly, you can’t start writing until the innovation is clear, and the final draft can’t be completed without your confirmation. It also uses XYZ multi-axis searches to verify that a “research gap” truly exists—never treating “I didn’t find it” as “no one has studied it.” Other AI helps you write faster. This Skill has you start later, so you get it right the first time.

Related Skills

View all
Write

Human-Sounding WeChat Writing

Turn a trending event, social phenomenon, workplace or relationship topic, personal experience, industry observation, product material, or existing draft into a WeChat article with a clear stance, genuine emotion, and strong shareability. Rather than settling for a safe “both sides have a point,” it helps you find an angle that fits your target readers, identify the real conflict and pain points, and use specific scenes, everyday details, and memorable judgments to make the article sound like it was written by a real person with experience, preferences, and an awareness of their own limits. Along with a ready-to-publish draft, it also organizes the creative decisions, title directions, and article’s core points. It prepares authorial responses for real comment scenarios—including challenges to the facts, opposing views, personal experience sharing, and quotes taken out of context—so you can handle discussion after publication. For trending topics, controversial events, and high-risk content involving legal, medical, or financial matters, it distinguishes known facts, reasonable inferences, and the author’s judgment, avoids fabricated information, and flags areas that still need sources or verification. It is suited to WeChat public account authors, independent media editors, and content teams writing about social observations, workplace communication, relationship perspectives, personal growth, and industry commentary. It is especially useful when you want to move beyond detached neutrality and an AI-like voice without relying on personal attacks, exaggerating facts, or creating unnecessary conflict to gain reach.

P
2999
Write

Video copywriting for social media

Analyze a video or transcript immediately, prepare evidence-based and platform-native multi-platform titles and copy, and recommend an editable SOCIAL MEDIA PUBLISH WORKSPACE webpage with 9:16 previews while keeping a concise plain-text copy document available as an alternative.

T
64Free
Write

Evergreen Refresh Radar

Everything in this marketplace helps you publish something new. Nothing helps you keep the last two years of your work from quietly going wrong. Published content rots. The statistic you quoted has moved. The link still resolves but the page it points to no longer contains the claim. The tool you recommended killed its free tier. The word "recently" is doing damage every single day it sits there. Your readers do not email you about any of this. They just trust you slightly less. Evergreen Refresh Radar audits what you already put out. Seven kinds of decay, checked one by one: dead evidence, stale numbers, superseded facts, time-anchored language, broken predictions, contextual drift, and surface rot. It opens every link and confirms the cited claim is still on the page, which is the failure mode almost nobody checks and the one that quietly turns a good piece into a wrong one. Then it ranks. Refresh ROI is value at stake multiplied by severity, divided by effort, with durability as the tiebreaker, sorted into PATCH NOW, SCHEDULE, REWRITE, and RETIRE OR REDIRECT. It will tell you which pieces need nothing at all, because an audit that finds work everywhere is not an audit. And it writes the patch. Original sentence, replacement sentence, new source, new date, ready to paste, matched to the sentence length and vocabulary of the paragraph around it so the fix does not read as a scar. It drafts the update note your reader should see, in two registers, and it will never suggest you change a substantive claim silently. It can run as a scheduled task, monthly, reporting only what has newly decayed, keeping a running Decay Log so you can see the health of your catalogue over time instead of discovering it in a reply. For bloggers, newsletter writers, documentation owners, course creators, agencies maintaining client sites, and anyone whose search traffic and credibility depend on work they wrote a long time ago.

M
1100

Find your next favorite skill

Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.

Explore all skills