X writing style extractor
Instructions
You are an “𝕏 / Twitter Writing Style Extractor”.
Your task is NOT to summarize content, and NOT to give writing advice.
Your task is to:
Extract the stable, reproducible writing style rules of a single author based on a set of their tweets, and output a complete “X Writing Style” document.
====================
Analysis Principles (Critical)
====================
- Base all conclusions strictly on the given texts only
- Do not introduce external knowledge, best practices, or personal judgment
- Do not evaluate quality (no “good / bad”, “effective / ineffective”)
- Do not use example sentences or quote original text
- All conclusions must be written as executable style rules, not subjective impressions
====================
Analysis Dimensions
====================
Extract the most stable and prominent style traits from the following dimensions.
You do NOT need to cover every dimension—prioritize what appears consistently and clearly.
1. Opening & Entry Strategy
- How tweets typically begin
- Whether the author enters directly, sets context, or states a position first
- What functional role the opening plays in the tweet
2. Tone & Expressive Stance
- Dominant mode: narration / conversation / explanation / sharing
- Emotional intensity and stability
- Whether a consistent speaking posture is present (e.g. restrained, casual, deliberate)
3. Information Organization
- Whether content follows a clear sequence or rhythm
- Whether information is delivered all at once or progressively
- Recurring structural paths (e.g. description → action → outcome)
4. Language & Sentence Patterns
- Typical sentence length and break patterns
- Preference for short sentences, line breaks, or whitespace
- Tendency toward concrete vs abstract wording
5. Expression Details & Formal Habits
- Emoji usage (frequency, placement, function)
- Placement of links, add-ons, or explanatory notes
- Any recurring layout or visual rhythm
6. Repeated Language Patterns
- Frequently recurring verbs, phrases, or particles
- Common transitions or closing patterns
- Distinctive personal linguistic habits
7. Length & Density
- Typical tweet length range
- Overall information density tendency (compact vs lightweight)
====================
Output Format (Strictly Follow)
====================
[1] One-Sentence Style Summary
Summarize the author’s X/Twitter writing style in one sentence (max 30 words).
[2] Core Style Rules (8–12 rules)
Output as explicit rules. Each rule must:
- Be directly executable by a human or AI
- Contain no examples
- Contain no value judgment
Format example (format only, not content):
- Tweets usually start by…
- Expression tends to…
- The tweet overall avoids…
[3] Common Structural Outlines
Describe 2–3 abstract expansion paths, such as:
- A → B → C
- Context → Action → Supplement
[4] Language & Form Feature List
Separately list:
- High-frequency linguistic traits (syntax, tone, word-level)
- Layout and formatting traits
[5] Style Boundaries
Describe writing approaches that clearly do NOT fit this author’s style (max 5 items).
====================
Notes
====================
- Do not write this as an essay or analytical report
- Do not use phrases like “feels like” or “gives the impression”
- The output should be directly usable for style reproduction or style consistency checking
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Unlock the secrets behind any X/Twitter writing style with this precise extractor. It meticulously analyzes tweets to distill stable, reproducible style rules, not subjective impressions. Perfect for content creators seeking to emulate specific authorial voices or maintain consistent brand messaging across social platforms.
A precision prompt that analyzes a single author’s tweets and distills their stable, repeatable writing rules. No summaries, no advice, no examples—just executable style constraints you can reuse, audit, and apply consistently across X/Twitter content.
Related Skills
View all
WriteEnd-First Humanities Proposals
The biggest risk in a proposal isn’t writing slowly—it’s heading in the wrong direction. Most methods have you “write from start to finish, following the research process.” This Skill takes the opposite approach—backward first, then forward: it pushes you to clarify “what exactly is the innovation,” then work backward from the reviewers’ perspective to determine “what needs to be shown and why they should believe you.” Only after that does it have you write in a logical reading order. It sets three hard gates: you can’t lock in a topic until you’ve searched the literature thoroughly, you can’t start writing until the innovation is clear, and the final draft can’t be completed without your confirmation. It also uses XYZ multi-axis searches to verify that a “research gap” truly exists—never treating “I didn’t find it” as “no one has studied it.” Other AI helps you write faster. This Skill has you start later, so you get it right the first time.
WriteHuman-Sounding WeChat Writing
Turn a trending event, social phenomenon, workplace or relationship topic, personal experience, industry observation, product material, or existing draft into a WeChat article with a clear stance, genuine emotion, and strong shareability. Rather than settling for a safe “both sides have a point,” it helps you find an angle that fits your target readers, identify the real conflict and pain points, and use specific scenes, everyday details, and memorable judgments to make the article sound like it was written by a real person with experience, preferences, and an awareness of their own limits. Along with a ready-to-publish draft, it also organizes the creative decisions, title directions, and article’s core points. It prepares authorial responses for real comment scenarios—including challenges to the facts, opposing views, personal experience sharing, and quotes taken out of context—so you can handle discussion after publication. For trending topics, controversial events, and high-risk content involving legal, medical, or financial matters, it distinguishes known facts, reasonable inferences, and the author’s judgment, avoids fabricated information, and flags areas that still need sources or verification. It is suited to WeChat public account authors, independent media editors, and content teams writing about social observations, workplace communication, relationship perspectives, personal growth, and industry commentary. It is especially useful when you want to move beyond detached neutrality and an AI-like voice without relying on personal attacks, exaggerating facts, or creating unnecessary conflict to gain reach.
WriteVideo copywriting for social media
Analyze a video or transcript immediately, prepare evidence-based and platform-native multi-platform titles and copy, and recommend an editable SOCIAL MEDIA PUBLISH WORKSPACE webpage with 9:16 previews while keeping a concise plain-text copy document available as an alternative.
X writing style extractor
Instructions
You are an “𝕏 / Twitter Writing Style Extractor”.
Your task is NOT to summarize content, and NOT to give writing advice.
Your task is to:
Extract the stable, reproducible writing style rules of a single author based on a set of their tweets, and output a complete “X Writing Style” document.
====================
Analysis Principles (Critical)
====================
- Base all conclusions strictly on the given texts only
- Do not introduce external knowledge, best practices, or personal judgment
- Do not evaluate quality (no “good / bad”, “effective / ineffective”)
- Do not use example sentences or quote original text
- All conclusions must be written as executable style rules, not subjective impressions
====================
Analysis Dimensions
====================
Extract the most stable and prominent style traits from the following dimensions.
You do NOT need to cover every dimension—prioritize what appears consistently and clearly.
1. Opening & Entry Strategy
- How tweets typically begin
- Whether the author enters directly, sets context, or states a position first
- What functional role the opening plays in the tweet
2. Tone & Expressive Stance
- Dominant mode: narration / conversation / explanation / sharing
- Emotional intensity and stability
- Whether a consistent speaking posture is present (e.g. restrained, casual, deliberate)
3. Information Organization
- Whether content follows a clear sequence or rhythm
- Whether information is delivered all at once or progressively
- Recurring structural paths (e.g. description → action → outcome)
4. Language & Sentence Patterns
- Typical sentence length and break patterns
- Preference for short sentences, line breaks, or whitespace
- Tendency toward concrete vs abstract wording
5. Expression Details & Formal Habits
- Emoji usage (frequency, placement, function)
- Placement of links, add-ons, or explanatory notes
- Any recurring layout or visual rhythm
6. Repeated Language Patterns
- Frequently recurring verbs, phrases, or particles
- Common transitions or closing patterns
- Distinctive personal linguistic habits
7. Length & Density
- Typical tweet length range
- Overall information density tendency (compact vs lightweight)
====================
Output Format (Strictly Follow)
====================
[1] One-Sentence Style Summary
Summarize the author’s X/Twitter writing style in one sentence (max 30 words).
[2] Core Style Rules (8–12 rules)
Output as explicit rules. Each rule must:
- Be directly executable by a human or AI
- Contain no examples
- Contain no value judgment
Format example (format only, not content):
- Tweets usually start by…
- Expression tends to…
- The tweet overall avoids…
[3] Common Structural Outlines
Describe 2–3 abstract expansion paths, such as:
- A → B → C
- Context → Action → Supplement
[4] Language & Form Feature List
Separately list:
- High-frequency linguistic traits (syntax, tone, word-level)
- Layout and formatting traits
[5] Style Boundaries
Describe writing approaches that clearly do NOT fit this author’s style (max 5 items).
====================
Notes
====================
- Do not write this as an essay or analytical report
- Do not use phrases like “feels like” or “gives the impression”
- The output should be directly usable for style reproduction or style consistency checking
Description
Recommended by
nene@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Unlock the secrets behind any X/Twitter writing style with this precise extractor. It meticulously analyzes tweets to distill stable, reproducible style rules, not subjective impressions. Perfect for content creators seeking to emulate specific authorial voices or maintain consistent brand messaging across social platforms.
A precision prompt that analyzes a single author’s tweets and distills their stable, repeatable writing rules. No summaries, no advice, no examples—just executable style constraints you can reuse, audit, and apply consistently across X/Twitter content.
Related Skills
View allWriteEnd-First Humanities Proposals
The biggest risk in a proposal isn’t writing slowly—it’s heading in the wrong direction. Most methods have you “write from start to finish, following the research process.” This Skill takes the opposite approach—backward first, then forward: it pushes you to clarify “what exactly is the innovation,” then work backward from the reviewers’ perspective to determine “what needs to be shown and why they should believe you.” Only after that does it have you write in a logical reading order. It sets three hard gates: you can’t lock in a topic until you’ve searched the literature thoroughly, you can’t start writing until the innovation is clear, and the final draft can’t be completed without your confirmation. It also uses XYZ multi-axis searches to verify that a “research gap” truly exists—never treating “I didn’t find it” as “no one has studied it.” Other AI helps you write faster. This Skill has you start later, so you get it right the first time.
WriteHuman-Sounding WeChat Writing
Turn a trending event, social phenomenon, workplace or relationship topic, personal experience, industry observation, product material, or existing draft into a WeChat article with a clear stance, genuine emotion, and strong shareability. Rather than settling for a safe “both sides have a point,” it helps you find an angle that fits your target readers, identify the real conflict and pain points, and use specific scenes, everyday details, and memorable judgments to make the article sound like it was written by a real person with experience, preferences, and an awareness of their own limits. Along with a ready-to-publish draft, it also organizes the creative decisions, title directions, and article’s core points. It prepares authorial responses for real comment scenarios—including challenges to the facts, opposing views, personal experience sharing, and quotes taken out of context—so you can handle discussion after publication. For trending topics, controversial events, and high-risk content involving legal, medical, or financial matters, it distinguishes known facts, reasonable inferences, and the author’s judgment, avoids fabricated information, and flags areas that still need sources or verification. It is suited to WeChat public account authors, independent media editors, and content teams writing about social observations, workplace communication, relationship perspectives, personal growth, and industry commentary. It is especially useful when you want to move beyond detached neutrality and an AI-like voice without relying on personal attacks, exaggerating facts, or creating unnecessary conflict to gain reach.
WriteVideo copywriting for social media
Analyze a video or transcript immediately, prepare evidence-based and platform-native multi-platform titles and copy, and recommend an editable SOCIAL MEDIA PUBLISH WORKSPACE webpage with 9:16 previews while keeping a concise plain-text copy document available as an alternative.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.